Increased rewards

CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6
Diar Kabam moderators
Could you consider the issue about increasing awards for the alliance officers , during the completion of the Alliance war cycles or at the end of the season as a whole. Because this category of players undergoes painstaking and extensive work in this mode, and receive rewards on an equal basis with everyone else. This big job should be rewarded according to its merits. You have already taken one step towards rewarding the individual player in the war of alliances, you began to take into account individual indicators based on the results of the battle, why not take a second, and finally encourage the officers, because a successful game depends of a large knowledge in this mode.Increased rewards will motivate players to take the functions of officer. Currently it is very difficult to find players which is like to take the additional responsibilities.
This will greatly contribute to the promotion and development of our Favorite game.
Best regards!

Comments

  • xLunatiXxxLunatiXx Member Posts: 1,424 ★★★★★
    As a former officer and leader, no. I know it's hard to find replacement but giving extra rewards will attract non motivated players, less knowledgeable and leaches.
    Being an officer out of good will, with no extra rewards is the healthiest setup imo.
    Take pride in what you're doing for the other members, at least that's something.
  • CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6
    That's why you are ex officer, coz no motivation doing extra job for your alliance
  • BuggyDClownBuggyDClown Member Posts: 2,371 ★★★★★
    Are you in silver,gold, or plat??
  • Java_JunkieJava_Junkie Member Posts: 518 ★★
    yeah, if it's "extra work", either your own personal expectations are above the goals you set communally with your own alliance, or you have people choosing not to meet them goals (which they agreed to as members) and need booting.

    heavy is the head that hangs the crown, dude. alliances are optional. leading an alliance is optional. and setting up the goals of an alliance, developing officers to communicate and plan, accepting and keeping/ kicking members, are all chosen and accepted responsibilities from there.

    they payoff is in the reward levels your team achieve together. leader reaps the benefits based on the people they develop and work with. the EXTRA is, you get to steer. set the tone, add and kick, tailor the team to personal standards.
  • xLunatiXxxLunatiXx Member Posts: 1,424 ★★★★★
    Carzy said:

    That's why you are ex officer, coz no motivation doing extra job for your alliance

    No cause I decided to play higher level wars. But thank you for your insight.
    Now with that attitude I wouldn't be surprised why you can't find people helping running your alliance 😂
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,622 ★★★★★
    Bro proved why no one wants to be in his alliance in 2 messages lol
  • VishnyaVishnya Member Posts: 1
    Sure. Why not. Not everyone can be lead or officer coz of some reason. So it should be rewarded
  • CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6
    ahmynuts said:

    Bro proved why no one wants to be in his alliance in 2 messages lol

    The bro proved in two messages that you are an empty place and you are not interested in the fate of other players, in particular the work that is not marked in any way and apparently to people in life who are surrounded by the same attitude
  • CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6

    Are you in silver,gold, or plat??

    What's the difference? Gold, silver, officers everywhere do the same job and get nothing for it
  • CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6
    xLunatiXx said:

    Carzy said:

    That's why you are ex officer, coz no motivation doing extra job for your alliance

    No cause I decided to play higher level wars. But thank you for your insight.
    Now with that attitude I wouldn't be surprised why you can't find people helping running your alliance 😂
    Thank you also for your misunderstanding)))
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 9,721 ★★★★★
    You say kabam should give extra rewards based on merit, yet you want extra rewards just for your position. Isn't this contradictory.

    Merit should be determined by effort.
  • CarzyCarzy Member Posts: 6

    You say kabam should give extra rewards based on merit, yet you want extra rewards just for your position. Isn't this contradictory.

    Merit should be determined by effort.

    The position of an officer implies a certain additional burden on the player, how can you not understand if you are not normal?
  • Rayven5220Rayven5220 Member Posts: 2,107 ★★★★★
    You choose to be leadership in an alliance, just like I choose what content to focus on.

    It's a choice. You're not gonna get extra rewards for deciding you want to play the role of officer or leader of an alliance.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,079 ★★★★★
    Carzy said:

    That's why you are ex officer, coz no motivation doing extra job for your alliance

    This was a super mature comment.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,079 ★★★★★
    Carzy said:

    You say kabam should give extra rewards based on merit, yet you want extra rewards just for your position. Isn't this contradictory.

    Merit should be determined by effort.

    The position of an officer implies a certain additional burden on the player, how can you not understand if you are not normal?
    At the same time, what if that officer is the backup in AW and doesn't take any fights? What if that officer dies more than others in the BG?

    It's not like officers are all the most highly skilled of the groups. They don't always take the hardest fights and they certainly don't always do more for the bgs than other members.
Sign In or Register to comment.