AW MATCHMAKING and RANKINGS RIGGED!?
linux
Member Posts: 302 ★
Is there something going on with AW and the way they rank and matchmake? We have alliances with a 3600 rating in masters but still matching p1 teams while other alliances with a 3800 rating in p1 matching top 10 alliances? How and why is this okay and fair?
So to be frank and correct me if I'm wrong here, war is only Looked at for wins then? Why have ATBS then? Because some alliances at the top of the game (don't need to name any) will match another top 10 team and that alliance will let's say lose 4-2. That losing team falls down now in Plat 1 let's say, but because a plat 1 team won 20-16 they move up passed that team that just lost 4-2? With their rating being 200+ points below them? But it's okay ......because the NEXT WAR that NEWLY MASTER, once p1 team from a war ago is finally in masters but WILL STILL MATCH a Plat 1 team while the team who lost 4-2 the war prior STILL PLAYS another top 10 team the next war LMAO. To fall further down the track....imagine seeing a 37xx rating alliance in P2?? 🤣....WHERE IS THE LOGIC here!? kabams best game mode is crumbling and then don't even seem to care or notice. I look at the leaderboards and LAUGH seeing some of the alliances in masters. Dying 200+ times a season but getting Masters while teams with 60 deaths on a season finish top P1....make it make sense!!
They need to completely overhaul the AW system and figure a way to balance it better because as of right now....getting Masters means Jack.....KABAM FIX MATCHMAKING OR MAKE RATINGS MATTER FOR A SET OF REWARDS at the end of season! No way should a team with a 200 point difference finish higher because they have 1 more win, what the hell is the ratings for then??
So to be frank and correct me if I'm wrong here, war is only Looked at for wins then? Why have ATBS then? Because some alliances at the top of the game (don't need to name any) will match another top 10 team and that alliance will let's say lose 4-2. That losing team falls down now in Plat 1 let's say, but because a plat 1 team won 20-16 they move up passed that team that just lost 4-2? With their rating being 200+ points below them? But it's okay ......because the NEXT WAR that NEWLY MASTER, once p1 team from a war ago is finally in masters but WILL STILL MATCH a Plat 1 team while the team who lost 4-2 the war prior STILL PLAYS another top 10 team the next war LMAO. To fall further down the track....imagine seeing a 37xx rating alliance in P2?? 🤣....WHERE IS THE LOGIC here!? kabams best game mode is crumbling and then don't even seem to care or notice. I look at the leaderboards and LAUGH seeing some of the alliances in masters. Dying 200+ times a season but getting Masters while teams with 60 deaths on a season finish top P1....make it make sense!!
They need to completely overhaul the AW system and figure a way to balance it better because as of right now....getting Masters means Jack.....KABAM FIX MATCHMAKING OR MAKE RATINGS MATTER FOR A SET OF REWARDS at the end of season! No way should a team with a 200 point difference finish higher because they have 1 more win, what the hell is the ratings for then??
0
Comments