Apache wrote: » Is this RNG at work? if so change that ****
Apache wrote: » Raganator wrote: » That's exactly how an RGN works. Bet you wouldn't complain if you pulled someone you actually wanted twice. well no **** i wouldn't complain captain obvious
Raganator wrote: » That's exactly how an RGN works. Bet you wouldn't complain if you pulled someone you actually wanted twice.
BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » Is this RNG at work? if so change that **** Simple probability. Why is it unfair when you get two bad champs but if you got 2 good ones it's fine and everything happy and dandy. Just because something goes against you doesn't mean kabam have rigged it
Apache wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » Is this RNG at work? if so change that **** Simple probability. Why is it unfair when you get two bad champs but if you got 2 good ones it's fine and everything happy and dandy. Just because something goes against you doesn't mean kabam have rigged it kabam manipulates the RNG for some
BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » Is this RNG at work? if so change that **** Simple probability. Why is it unfair when you get two bad champs but if you got 2 good ones it's fine and everything happy and dandy. Just because something goes against you doesn't mean kabam have rigged it kabam manipulates the RNG for some You sound very confident considering that's a statement you have no proof for.
Apache wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Apache wrote: » Is this RNG at work? if so change that **** Simple probability. Why is it unfair when you get two bad champs but if you got 2 good ones it's fine and everything happy and dandy. Just because something goes against you doesn't mean kabam have rigged it kabam manipulates the RNG for some You sound very confident considering that's a statement you have no proof for. i have trust issue's with poorly run corporations