Primmer79 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me. He is referencing 12.0 and how compensation was based on total PI. This separated some people who sold champions. People called for it to be based on prestige instead. Not the same thing, IMO, but if they're basing rewards off of how 'strong' your account is, I'd rather it be prestige than PI. I don't have a problem with HOW they're separating brackets, but it seems like the last bracket is too high just for some 5 star champions. That was an example, but it's come up many times before, everything from War to Events. And not always where it's a great idea, lol. But here, I agree with it, just disagree with execution of it
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me. He is referencing 12.0 and how compensation was based on total PI. This separated some people who sold champions. People called for it to be based on prestige instead. Not the same thing, IMO, but if they're basing rewards off of how 'strong' your account is, I'd rather it be prestige than PI. I don't have a problem with HOW they're separating brackets, but it seems like the last bracket is too high just for some 5 star champions. That was an example, but it's come up many times before, everything from War to Events.
Primmer79 wrote: » Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me. He is referencing 12.0 and how compensation was based on total PI. This separated some people who sold champions. People called for it to be based on prestige instead. Not the same thing, IMO, but if they're basing rewards off of how 'strong' your account is, I'd rather it be prestige than PI. I don't have a problem with HOW they're separating brackets, but it seems like the last bracket is too high just for some 5 star champions.
Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me. He is referencing 12.0 and how compensation was based on total PI. This separated some people who sold champions. People called for it to be based on prestige instead. Not the same thing, IMO, but if they're basing rewards off of how 'strong' your account is, I'd rather it be prestige than PI. I don't have a problem with HOW they're separating brackets, but it seems like the last bracket is too high just for some 5 star champions. That was an example, but it's come up many times before, everything from War to Events. And not always where it's a great idea, lol. But here, I agree with it, just disagree with execution of it Well, it's a bit of a Catch-22. If they announced it ahead of time, I could see people scrambling to raise it. I could also see people accusing them of trying to boost sales, or other possible conflicts. Equally as conflicting if they released it after the fact, as we saw in the past. It is what it is.
Primmer79 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » Gwendoline wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Honestly, it was the Players that asked for a system based on Prestige. If anyone remembers the Awakening Gem of 12.0, or the multiple times people have mentioned awarding things based on Prestige. AQ is gauged the same way. While I relate to wanting all Milestones and Rewards, the system itself is nothing new, and I think it's important to mention this is what we asked for. No one asked for this and I can’t remember a time before where people saw different milestones, apart from arena (time based, not prestige based) and the really early on solo events. I don’t know if the solo events where time or prestige based because when they where introduced I was in the highest bracket already. And very soon people enter into the highest possible bracket. Important to note is that all milestones are different here, different points needed and different rewards, they aren’t seeing the same as we are minus the last (couple of) milestones. So please point out how this is “nothing new” because it feels pretty new to me. He is referencing 12.0 and how compensation was based on total PI. This separated some people who sold champions. People called for it to be based on prestige instead. Not the same thing, IMO, but if they're basing rewards off of how 'strong' your account is, I'd rather it be prestige than PI. I don't have a problem with HOW they're separating brackets, but it seems like the last bracket is too high just for some 5 star champions. That was an example, but it's come up many times before, everything from War to Events. And not always where it's a great idea, lol. But here, I agree with it, just disagree with execution of it Well, it's a bit of a Catch-22. If they announced it ahead of time, I could see people scrambling to raise it. I could also see people accusing them of trying to boost sales, or other possible conflicts. Equally as conflicting if they released it after the fact, as we saw in the past. It is what it is. I'll clarify more - the brackets I disagree with. Not necessarily announcing it. I know different events, different sales, different promotions. Buy a 5* with any account? sure! Win a 5* with 2*? sure! Grind out some hard dungeon content for a 5*? nah. I think (which means my opinion) two separate brackets (milestones and 5* crystals) wasn't necessary, but also feel the bracket for the highest is a little high. It is what it is, so I'm just voicing my opinion at this point. Side point - AQ rewards are based on alliance prestige. We can see alliance prestige. Dungeon bracket is based on profile prestige. We can't see profile prestige. Would be nice not to have to hop between things to calculate it all.
Kabam DK wrote: » A_Noob_Is1 wrote: » 1. Will people like the collector/maestro/the nameless be in the dungeon? 2. Can you possibly play up to a room with like 1 million rated characters? 3. Will any of the nodes like apsect of war/chaos be present? 1. No. 2. In theory, yes. I will personally high five you if you actually make it to a room with opponents with 1,000,000 Rating. 3. We aren't revealing what Buffs will be in the mode because we don't want to spoil the fun of doing your first few Dungeons
A_Noob_Is1 wrote: » 1. Will people like the collector/maestro/the nameless be in the dungeon? 2. Can you possibly play up to a room with like 1 million rated characters? 3. Will any of the nodes like apsect of war/chaos be present?
Bajjsbwuqjw wrote: » How are we able to buy the first week 27k 5* crystalls before they timeout if we can play only 1950 a day and that would be about 14000 dark items
The_Grandmaster wrote: » so far this event seems like a major hassle. So far I have teamed up with people who only wanted to do a room or 2 and bail which cost me some good champs to now be locked. Had people who wouldn't communicate and just did whatever they wanted. and not to mention the endless conversations of people just trying to find partners to play a dungeon with. This is going to be a long month full of aggravation. And btw I don't know why Kabam has to be so secretive about the PI of the teams in each dungeon and how much point they award. Someone from the community will figure all this out and post it for us all to know eventually so it makes no sense for Kabam to not do it first. Overall I was hyped for this event but after 1 day of playing it I am now thinking it will be just another disappointment
Nomarigerol wrote: » The_Grandmaster wrote: » so far this event seems like a major hassle. So far I have teamed up with people who only wanted to do a room or 2 and bail which cost me some good champs to now be locked. Had people who wouldn't communicate and just did whatever they wanted. and not to mention the endless conversations of people just trying to find partners to play a dungeon with. This is going to be a long month full of aggravation. And btw I don't know why Kabam has to be so secretive about the PI of the teams in each dungeon and how much point they award. Someone from the community will figure all this out and post it for us all to know eventually so it makes no sense for Kabam to not do it first. Overall I was hyped for this event but after 1 day of playing it I am now thinking it will be just another disappointment so time consuming, and for what in the end ? 27k dark artifacts seem unreachable unless you play everyday like your life depends on it, and as for the the infinity dust meh, the other way to win it seem easier
Cheesedit wrote: » SuperFarz wrote: » I see people are getting confused. From what I see there are 2 cutoffs. One cutoff from being able to see the 5* chrystal and another cutoff for the highest milestone in dungeon. It’s just unfortunate that no information is available on the requirements. Event however is fun and well made ( except chat). However whatever the cutoff is the people just below it will be mad and frustrated. As usual time is needed to grow your account so for the next time you will be hopefully qualified. So a 400k or 500k needs more time to grow? Lol ok, you must be getting all the rewards.
SuperFarz wrote: » I see people are getting confused. From what I see there are 2 cutoffs. One cutoff from being able to see the 5* chrystal and another cutoff for the highest milestone in dungeon. It’s just unfortunate that no information is available on the requirements. Event however is fun and well made ( except chat). However whatever the cutoff is the people just below it will be mad and frustrated. As usual time is needed to grow your account so for the next time you will be hopefully qualified.
Bajjsbwuqjw wrote: » Primmer79 wrote: » Bajjsbwuqjw wrote: » How are we able to buy the first week 27k 5* crystalls before they timeout if we can play only 1950 a day and that would be about 14000 dark items check the announcement I did but it doesnt make sense to sell crystalls with timeout that cannot be bought
Primmer79 wrote: » Bajjsbwuqjw wrote: » How are we able to buy the first week 27k 5* crystalls before they timeout if we can play only 1950 a day and that would be about 14000 dark items check the announcement
gohard123 wrote: » Why are the dungeons ending 12 hours from now when they only started 8 hours ago? Is it meant to be 24 hr or 20 hour duration ?
gohard123 wrote: » gohard123 wrote: » Why are the dungeons ending 12 hours from now when they only started 8 hours ago? Is it meant to be 24 hr or 20 hour duration ? This is an important question @Kabam Miike
Eddiefil wrote: » Parthyzan wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » Dr_Physico wrote: » Are there different milestone "settings" and what do they depend on? Some colleagues have the fifth (last) milestone at 7500 points, while in my account the fifth is at 5000 points (and less dust, artifacts & gold). There are brackets to the Milestones. More experienced players will see higher Milestone thresholds than players that do not have as strong Rosters. I know this isn't what you'd like to hear, but this is done to ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of progress for players, and not to overload newer players with Champions and Items that they cannot use yet, or are too powerful for their current progression. This is not fair. I'm uncollected for a long time, i have completed Nameless Guillotine, have 6* heroe, multiple R4 5*s, and not enough experienced for the last reward? I'm not allowed to get the highest possible reward with 500k rating? Are you serious? This is completely unacceptable.... This is the biggest **** what you ever done with this game.... Didn't you hear Mike? It's to prevent "brand new summoners" from getting stuff such as the 5* hero crystal, your out of luck since your "brand new" according to Kabam.
Parthyzan wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » Dr_Physico wrote: » Are there different milestone "settings" and what do they depend on? Some colleagues have the fifth (last) milestone at 7500 points, while in my account the fifth is at 5000 points (and less dust, artifacts & gold). There are brackets to the Milestones. More experienced players will see higher Milestone thresholds than players that do not have as strong Rosters. I know this isn't what you'd like to hear, but this is done to ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of progress for players, and not to overload newer players with Champions and Items that they cannot use yet, or are too powerful for their current progression. This is not fair. I'm uncollected for a long time, i have completed Nameless Guillotine, have 6* heroe, multiple R4 5*s, and not enough experienced for the last reward? I'm not allowed to get the highest possible reward with 500k rating? Are you serious? This is completely unacceptable.... This is the biggest **** what you ever done with this game....
Kabam Miike wrote: » Dr_Physico wrote: » Are there different milestone "settings" and what do they depend on? Some colleagues have the fifth (last) milestone at 7500 points, while in my account the fifth is at 5000 points (and less dust, artifacts & gold). There are brackets to the Milestones. More experienced players will see higher Milestone thresholds than players that do not have as strong Rosters. I know this isn't what you'd like to hear, but this is done to ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of progress for players, and not to overload newer players with Champions and Items that they cannot use yet, or are too powerful for their current progression.
Dr_Physico wrote: » Are there different milestone "settings" and what do they depend on? Some colleagues have the fifth (last) milestone at 7500 points, while in my account the fifth is at 5000 points (and less dust, artifacts & gold).