v18.1 Discussion Thread

1246712

Comments

  • ScottLangScottLang Member Posts: 149
    Lol if you lure an opponents heavy you can do the same thing and his stun still works just not on unstunnable nodes which makes perfect sense
  • Username1583Username1583 Member Posts: 165
    The stun on his neurotoxin is a very important mechanic for boss fights like Magik or Modok and you're now changing it as an ordinary bug despite months ago you said it was working as intended. Hope it doesn't affect the stun duration in the labyrinth cause you'll create an enormous issue when fighting Spiderman and especially X23. Really disappointed on this change, bad Kabam! The game is full of bugs who need to be fixed (short evade for example) instead of ruining AA's abilities mechanic.
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 11,708 ★★★★★
    The stun on his neurotoxin is a very important mechanic for boss fights like Magik or Modok and you're now changing it as an ordinary bug despite months ago you said it was working as intended. Hope it doesn't affect the stun duration in the labyrinth cause you'll create an enormous issue when fighting Spiderman and especially X23. Really disappointed on this change, bad Kabam! The game is full of bugs who need to be fixed (short evade for example) instead of ruining AA's abilities mechanic.
    Im was using Sl for x23 and GP for spidey. And didt ryl need the stun im wuld agerd ther need to giv a AA spekifit rank Down ticeket.
  • ChickenChicken Member Posts: 160
    I would like to start off by saying that I completely understand why you had to fix this “bug”. Now I would like to give my opinion on the situation. You say in your post that you will not be distributing rank down tickets because you are fixing a bug and not changing fundamental game mechanics but to us since we had the wrong information and it was never corrected this was a fundamental game mechanic. To not give out rank down tickets is just not fair. I myself would not rank down my aa but what about the people who took a 5* aa to r5. If the wrong information which you guys provided was used to determine whether someone wanted to take him to r5 then that person should get the chance to rank him down. Thanks for listening.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 14,122 Guardian
    zw2tar35nzku.png

    It could easily be interpretted that the "works as intended" response was only referring to the portion of the post referring to Parry.
  • blindside493blindside493 Member Posts: 51
    @Kabam Miike any additional consideration given to this AA change? We rank champions based on gameplay and the information provided by Kabam, when you screw that information up, we shouldn't be hit negatively for that. Although the mod shared incorrect info, we still made real choices with that information. So if you're going to go back there, we must have some fair resolution.

    With this change - can you please confirm when AA neurotoxin stuns BPCW, will he receive the reflective stun even if he has additional neurotoxins still in effect
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 14,122 Guardian
    AA Stun issue... If an ability said "100% chance to cause Bleed", would you think it would still cause bleed on a bleed-immune robot, or on a bleed-immune node ? NO. And if for some reason it were doing that, they would be well justified to change it (even if for some reason the developers actually did want it to work that way at first).
    There are plenty of other major issues in the game, just dont' thnk this warrants all the attention.
  • nopenope Member Posts: 134
    SummonerNR wrote: »
    AA Stun issue... If an ability said "100% chance to cause Bleed", would you think it would still cause bleed on a bleed-immune robot, or on a bleed-immune node ? NO. And if for some reason it were doing that, they would be well justified to change it (even if for some reason the developers actually did want it to work that way at first).
    There are plenty of other major issues in the game, just dont' thnk this warrants all the attention.

    Missing the point as well
  • This content has been removed.
  • Willjackson16Willjackson16 Member Posts: 289 ★★
    nope wrote: »

    Agree with you. But be careful. I think asking for compensation is now against the forum rules. Waiting on confirmation of that
    Yeah I know but like someone said previously if Brian Grants calling for them there’s something wrong
  • RicardobaltoRicardobalto Member Posts: 238
    Seriously... so many comments pop up. How do I leave this thread?
  • MarzGrooveMarzGroove Member Posts: 903 ★★★
    IanMoone89 wrote: »

    You dont understand for an end player like myself falling behind isnt a option at all and if i opt to not do these side missions i fall behind...i already havent ranked any of my champs in over a month bc the champs i get from 5* are ****

    Sounds like you should be complaining to the mirror then.
Sign In or Register to comment.