Hammerbro_64 wrote: » It’s like Modok and Doc Ock. It could have gone either way and no one would question it.
Asmodeyus wrote: » technology caused her affliction, technology in the suit helps maintain her abilities and form. Best closest class is tech
V1PER1987 wrote: » I believe Antman and Yellowjacket are science because their powers are related to the Pym Particle (science). Wasp is an extension of that as well. The Pym Particle is the science behind the powers. The suit itself is more of a catalyst or control of the powers, not the actual source whereas for Iron Man, the suit provides all his powers.
Mirage_Turtle wrote: » V1PER1987 wrote: » I believe Antman and Yellowjacket are science because their powers are related to the Pym Particle (science). Wasp is an extension of that as well. The Pym Particle is the science behind the powers. The suit itself is more of a catalyst or control of the powers, not the actual source whereas for Iron Man, the suit provides all his powers. I'm not sure what some people consider science vs. technology. Technology is applied science. The two are related to be sure, but I'd say that Pym Particles in the Ant Man suit are a perfect example of Technology as an applied science. It took a lot of scientific research to figure out how to harness Pym Particles, but without the suit's technology to apply that science, you've got nothing. And don't forget the name of the company that made the Ant Man and Yellowjacket suits...Pym Technologies
V1PER1987 wrote: » Now unless Kabam decides to take classes one step further with dual classes (which has been discussed by many people including myself) it will be extremely difficult to pin down to one class. In the end there needs to be balance and you can’t just stick everyone into science or stick everyone into tech. Personally I think dual classes is an interesting concept but it would inevitably lead to more bugs and weird interactions and break more stuff in game.
Mirage_Turtle wrote: » V1PER1987 wrote: » Now unless Kabam decides to take classes one step further with dual classes (which has been discussed by many people including myself) it will be extremely difficult to pin down to one class. In the end there needs to be balance and you can’t just stick everyone into science or stick everyone into tech. Personally I think dual classes is an interesting concept but it would inevitably lead to more bugs and weird interactions and break more stuff in game. I liked the Dual classes. They seemed to test the waters with Karnak and then never did it again, which was a shame. So many complex champs who could use a blend of some sort: Unstoppable Colossus, Scarlet Witch and Magik: Mystic & Mutant. Ant Man, Yellowjacket, Wasp, Ghost, Green Goblin, and Stark Spidey: Science & Tech Agent Venom: Cosmic & Skill Not meant to be an exhaustive list. But adding these dual classes would put a lot of these silly debates to bed.
Reverend_Ruckus wrote: » Ghost has nothing to do with mystic either.
Oroku_Saki wrote: » Reverend_Ruckus wrote: » Ghost has nothing to do with mystic either. Ghosts are definitely mystic though... #freerooster30
Mirage_Turtle wrote: » I'm not sure what some people consider science vs. technology. Technology is applied science.
Maidril wrote: » Her suit is tech (as is the machine she uses) and I’d argue that’s what makes her who she is. Otherwise she’d be dead, no? But ultimately, science and tech are basically the same thing. With science being a broader category.
DNA3000 wrote: » Maidril wrote: » Her suit is tech (as is the machine she uses) and I’d argue that’s what makes her who she is. Otherwise she’d be dead, no? But ultimately, science and tech are basically the same thing. With science being a broader category. Science and technology are not the same thing, nor is one a subset of the other. Science is the systematic understanding of and knowledge about the universe. Technology is the application of knowledge into shaping or manipulating the universe. The relationship between science and technology is like the relationship between a composer and a conductor. Neither does something that is a superset or derivative version of the other.