PeterPan1991 wrote: » Over 25,000 units spent and a 4* 5/50 SL. Attack Power synergies. Antman/YJ & Red Magneto/Cyclops.
PeterPan1991 wrote: » I HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER! DID NOT CHEAT OR DO ANYTHING WRONG TO DESERVE THIS. I HAVE BEEN A WHALE FOR THIS GAME FOR OVER A YEAR. I GRINDED DAY IN AND DAY OUT. I HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY BANNED. THIS HAS TO BE RESOLVED. I WILL NOT STAND FOR THIS.
Addyos wrote: » Not saying this guy didn't cheat, but I've heard of some stories on reddit where people used a 4* 5/50 to beat LOL. From the responses above, I'm assuming a 4* only works in the easy path so one needs a 4/55 5* to fully complete LOL?
Vdh2008 wrote: » Addyos wrote: » Not saying this guy didn't cheat, but I've heard of some stories on reddit where people used a 4* 5/50 to beat LOL. From the responses above, I'm assuming a 4* only works in the easy path so one needs a 4/55 5* to fully complete LOL? Spending 5K units plus, the EASY path can be done with a 5/50 SL, but no amount of units will take a 5/50 4 star SL through 100%. Nope. At least not that I've seen.
Rbvojtik wrote: » Vdh2008 wrote: » Addyos wrote: » Not saying this guy didn't cheat, but I've heard of some stories on reddit where people used a 4* 5/50 to beat LOL. From the responses above, I'm assuming a 4* only works in the easy path so one needs a 4/55 5* to fully complete LOL? Spending 5K units plus, the EASY path can be done with a 5/50 SL, but no amount of units will take a 5/50 4 star SL through 100%. Nope. At least not that I've seen. Anything is possible in this game with enough money.
PeterPan1991 wrote: » @Vdh2008 you must be one terrible player.
Vdh2008 wrote: » They were temp banned pending investigations, I assume. Guys that they didn't have obvious evidence for so they had to dig into the logs, etc.
Invisible wrote: » Well then instead of 7 days or a month ban. kabam should have said banned till farther investigation.
DNA3000 wrote: » Invisible wrote: » Well then instead of 7 days or a month ban. kabam should have said banned till farther investigation. I don't think that is a good idea. For one thing, Kabam does not disclose the results of investigations, not even to the player being investigated. So if they told a player they were temp banned pending further investigation they could be pending investigation forever. There's no reason to keep a player in suspense like that. If the investigation turns up no further need for action, the player's temp ban stands and they don't need to know there was further action. If the investigation turns up a need to apply a permanent ban, there's no specific reason why Kabam needs to be worried about making that player angry about the second ban: they are permanently banned anyway.
Invisible wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » Invisible wrote: » Well then instead of 7 days or a month ban. kabam should have said banned till farther investigation. I don't think that is a good idea. For one thing, Kabam does not disclose the results of investigations, not even to the player being investigated. So if they told a player they were temp banned pending further investigation they could be pending investigation forever. There's no reason to keep a player in suspense like that. If the investigation turns up no further need for action, the player's temp ban stands and they don't need to know there was further action. If the investigation turns up a need to apply a permanent ban, there's no specific reason why Kabam needs to be worried about making that player angry about the second ban: they are permanently banned anyway. It is all business. Just before the permanent ban kabam put out shards deal and lol some just got of 7 days banned bought that deal thinking their punishment is over. And then next day bammm permanently banned. Also some alliance are suffering including mine.