TChallla ★
Comentarios
-
I’d max him out. Especially if his ability is awake. He is a rock solid fighter
-
The matchmaking system has worked very well for us the whole season. Most of our wars have been settled by less than 1,000 points and a good chunk under 250. The difference is stark.
-
After all this my alliance has decided to tank in the off season to gain an advantage when the season starts back up. Embarrassing 🤮
-
If that’s the case
-
You tank buddy. No way around it. Maybe not as blatant but your arguments don’t make sense with regards to content and champ use. There is plenty of time that explore content at full strength during the season.
-
Of course. Don’t be stupid. If time travel is possible the events that allowed the system in which he developed is where you start. Or maybe look at the geopolitical systems that value WMD’s and perpetual war instead of one baby. Why worry about hitler when western civilization obviously made a wrong turn hundreds if not…
-
Which is why you do it.
-
Why do that when you could just make it on your own with less stress and more time with loved ones.
-
Right here is a perfect example of why it’s wrong and harmful. This person who is suggesting that playing the game in a non-manipulative way actually causes stress, costs real resources, and robs them of time with their family. Those harmful impacts would not exist if taking on purpose was not allowed. Granted spending…
-
Just don’t play then. If we are going to use such simplistic logic and spending more time with people you “love” not playing at all is the only option.
-
So it absolutely applies to the competitive integrity of the game. The competitive integrity of the game is physically harmed by tanking. Let move on from that known fact.
-
You’re clearly bothered because this is a practice you participate in. Again since you walked down the language path I’d suggest nuance is applicable here. It’s certainly harming the level of competition of the game as well as the integrity. Harm isn’t exclusive to physical and emotional pain as you well know. In addition…
-
I’d say that since you’re being a stickler around language that you’re using deniability as a way to tank without actually saying it. At some point you can clear content and do well in war. Not to mention there are consistent periods during the season where all champs should be available during that month long period. As…
-
Yet you understand that’s not happening. We all know it's a game.
-
It’s safe to assume that we all understand that the context is gaming and not on the level of global atrocities.
-
He said terms of service LMAO!!! Listen, im not crying about it. The matchmaking system has provided good matchups for us in season but once the offseason hits it went haywire. If there was no issue people wouldn’t feel the need to completely alter their war strategy. I understand coming across as a bootstrapper but let us…
-
Luke Cage. It’s prey obvious Ghost is a woman. I wonder why so many people miss that.
-
I agree that the current system is fine but think your on to something. Fully maxing out a champ is a big deal so to speak and I think they should receive some kind of combat or health and attack permanent boost. A 15% boost to health and attack for being duped, max rank, and signature. Still couldn’t run act 6, stronger…
-
...
-
I agree
-
I gift to top BG MVP’s if we win. I do random rewards if someone steps up when we need it as well
-
I was under the impression that we could pull new members during the enlistment period and have them be eligible. As it stands I have two people that were able to join AQ but are being prevented from joining war. What gives?
-
Lots of speculation to unpack there. People will react differently I suppose. I have faith that my alliance wouldn’t dissolve into that cluster of backbiting and drama you just described. Right now i have officers that dont use the authority. I have a couple that do. I’d like to be able to recognize contributors without…
-
Just watched some video that suggested energy champs are the best option and avoid medium and heavy attacks it will allow his shield to run out
-
I run a well managed alliance with friendly people and reward system outside of what the game offers already. My members still want to be promoted with titles. I don’t mind that but I also don’t want all members to facilitate the alliance. I don’t see why everyone needs to have the ability to make minor changes or why we…
-
I have a pretty consistent system for incentive gifting but people still want to be recognized for their efforts. The game could use an extra layer where leaders and officers should be distinguished from say someone who’s just been around for a while. That or a co-leader model.
-
Thor ragnarok and Star lord were 4&5
-
I don’t allow it in my alliance. We certainly don’t want people being stupid but we don’t shame people in public. I take a lot of conversations to the messages. It’s a game.
