pd187 ★
Comentarios
-
So I didn't bother doing it before and I still won't bother now. There's no real point playing this game anymore. It has ceased to be fun. You all are so much better at fixing things for the top end and the beginners but then you screw the middle over with dumb stuff. Just pound sand.
-
Are the Avenger/Endgame solo objectives not actually active yet? I know there's tons of time before they "need" to be finished but I haven't gotten any progress on some of them (win arena fights against Avengers) despite meeting that threshold.
-
I know that we've had that happen quite regularly as well. There was a bounty started an hour and 8 minutes ago that just went *poof*
-
Couldn't it be something where there's a flag/trigger where if someone who has already 100%ed the content does 1 quest in the Act, e.g. beat the boss one more time, then it checks their completion percentage (which would still be 100%) and then gives them the missing/updated rewards that way then changes the flag/trigger…
-
That's not what I was saying. Act 6 4* ban doesn't factor into this issue other than the PR dumpster fire it caused. Don't twist words. It's not about giving the rewards to people who "don't need them anymore" but making sure they stay at the very least feeling neutral. If they're feeling neutral (or happy) then they might…
-
This is a separate thing from the 4* ban in Act 6. The rewards aren't the issue here so much as the "well we wanted to give them to everyone who accomplished but that's too hard so go pound sand if you haven't done it recently." I doubt many really care about some PHCs. If anything it is more about giving the "buffed"…
-
I'm just trying to figure out how, with all the data that gets logged about us, there is not some field logging exploration date. Obviously, there is one for completion because of the titles and there is one for exploration to get the rewards originally but you all log nearly everything else except the date? There could…
-
I know better than to feed you but... 4*s are far easier to obtain than 5*s and 6*s. Depending on where you are in the game, they're nearly given out like candy. I'm "solidly" mid-tier (maybe upper mid-tier) and I still get at least 2-3 4*s a week, more when I want the basic since my 4* roster is capable of that. The rate…
-
It happened to us too. We won but dropped down to tier 13 for some reason. I don't know if it has to do with matching up with a tier 13 alliance. I figure it was because the points are borked or we were matched before we won (with some other alliance winning before our war was over that caused us to drop). Either way, it…
-
I want to say both but it depends on where you're at. I have fond memories of running him, symbiote spider-man, and a third that I can't recall in AQ when I was just starting out but that was 3ish years ago now.en i just got a 4* colluses i want opinons on if hes good or garbage Comentario por pd187 enero 2019
-
Omitting the profanity that was my initial reaction to this, I'm letting my alliance choose what we do through a poll and I'll likely be skipping it unless filler is needed. We already were doing just 1 BG last war season because of the bleed over onto Christmas Day (which made me feel like such a Scrooge) and New Years…
-
I agree with your idea. Yes, it might not be perfect but it is a lot better than what happens now (nothing/support telling you to go pound sand). Disincentivizing people from cheating in any mode only makes the game more fair overall. Not covered here but also something needing a fix for AW is kicking after the 5 war cut…
-
I think the alliance would figure it out through the continued absence. If the leadership notices that every time there's a war @chunkyb and @Voltolos never place and never join in on the attack then it becomes fairly obvious that there was a cheating ban, specifically in wars. There would be only so many excuses you could…
-
Eh. It happens to everybody from time to time. Honestly now that you mention it, I can see how the confusion came about because of the "Xth to last" phrasing (and because English is such a terrible language) since the counting for "4th to last" would've gone 4th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st, last. A better clarification on my part would…
-
It was at the 5th out of the remaining 5 wars of the season so because the kicked people had placed on defense, were on attack, and were able to rejoin quick enough to continue the attack; they *should* get the season rewards because they will be participating in the remaining 5 wars of the season and hit eligibility for…
-
@"Kabam Miike" @Ad0ra_ @"Kabam Lyra" ? Any changelog for the new update?
-
Why exactly did you all feel it was truly necessary to shift the schedule to cut the break down by 1 day? I understand that part of what you want is for the players to constantly be playing and AQ/AW helps with that but with all the compla...er, "feedback" last time with the (intended) short break between AW seasons, I…
-
I mean self-serving or not, the point still stands and Kabam needs to do more policing, even if it results in their top spenders getting some ban time, whether that's 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, or permanent. With how short seasons are now, a month ban would probably be the sweet spot to discourage the behavior. I know it's…
-
It might be related with the Peak Milestones because they said they would do away with the brackets altogether with that. Could easily be "Normal" is the bracket they kept. The downside being it defaults to Map 2 and would have the 3 person join requirement.
-
It's not actually a bug technically by itself. When they redid the brackets, they made it so Normal bracket needed 3 people, Advanced needed 2, and Expert needs 1. Thus, when we all got moved to the Normal bracket, we all need 3 people to open up the next BG. Personally, I always felt it should've been reversed in order…