**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
GroundedWisdom ★★★★★
Réponses
-
Always been my stance.
-
Percentages don't stack. Each Crystal is a 15% chance, and that's just as true for opening 100 as it is for opening one.
-
Don't Parry is your first tip. I find Dani to be the most effective here.
-
Dani works well for Aegon and Dani on the right side, if you sacrifice using a Mutant on your first run and skip it on the second run.
-
You just proved my point. These progress markers are for an average of Players at that point. At the time they're released, it might be a feat for some, but the markers themselves are a standard. Content-rushing is not a standard for average, and I suspect that Kabam isn't holding that as a standard for Players at that…
-
That argument doesn't hold out. The same content was available to everyone, and they're still included in BGs. It's not a requirement for them to play BGs. That's literally the same as saying there's no problem with the way things are and if you don't like it, don't play it. The latter is logical. The former is not true.…
-
Again, it's not at all natural. That's a speed run. No Player starting out the game and progressing at a normal pace is hitting Valiant with 1M.
-
Hitting Valiant with a 2M Rating is not your average Player. That's someone with experience running an Alt. Those cases need to be discounted from the argument altogether because they don't represent natural progression. That's someone with previous knowledge doing a speed run. Story Mode and X amount of Y Champs at Z…
-
Technically, they have that in the Store.
-
Well I'm not going into the whole conspiracy aspect. That's not very productive. I will say, I was considering making a Post because the Quest really highlights the AI issues we've been having. I was running it, both in manual and auto, and I noticed some strange things. The AI dashing back the second I reached them to…dans April Fool Event! Clear Proof of Kabam change the AI speed Commentaire de GroundedWisdom 3 avril
-
Breathe
-
I got stuck on the first row for a good 15 minutes before I exited and decided to try later. Lol.
-
I figured I would keep it kosher. Being against the rules and all. That one did cross my mind, though. Hahaha.
-
Here we go again....
-
False. From about Plat 2 and up, it's random among everyone. The "Superbowl" is among them.
-
Wait a minute. You can't move the goal post. You gave an example and I pointed out how they're being placed in the same league. Someone that has a problem with 6* R4s can come up against 7* R3s. The argument stands.
-
Again, I didn't say the suggestion wasn't debatable, I'm talking about the overall issue.
-
Which is all fair. If it's a bad suggestion, then that's arguable. My point is for the overall dismissal.
-
They don't get put in a Superbowl game, then told to suck it up.
-
I'm not saying I have all the answers. I'm just saying if you look at the difference in Rosters from Plat and up and the limitations of the competition such as time, Nodes, increased Attack and Health....then there are bound to be people who have an issue with it.
-
People **** on others too much when they have an issue with the level of disparage between Rosters in BGs, and it's the equivalent of telling people to "Git gud.". It's a competition. That's redundant. The Rewards are meant to be appropriate to the effort someone puts in. That's also redundant. The issue people are facing…
-
I level all of them up.
-
I feel the same way. Mind you, mine have needed work for some time, but it's on the back burner. I don't plan on switching them out. It's nice to know I can, though.
-
This. If it's the materials to R3 another 7*, it's undoubtedly going to be behind Act Exploration. Logically-speaking, the largest Rewards would be for complete exploration overall.
-
Yes and no. Thor, SW, Wolverine, BW, etc...those Champs were intrinsically broken because of their Abilities, but it was also in combination of the old percentage-based system. It was a mathematical certainty that whatever was produced was easily destroyed by them. That's why the Champs as well as the entire system were…dans Quake and Magik are Just the First Victims of rarity Obsolescence Commentaire de GroundedWisdom 28 mars
-
How is that racist? There are language-based servers that can only communicate in that language successfully, and that's as much about conveying the information appropriately as it is about keeping the server organized.
-
See, this comment right here. Let's be honest. The only thing stopping the majority of Paragons is the existence of the two R3s. Before the Title even existed, everyone at that level was deep in the process of working on their 7* Roster. If someone made the argument that Valiant deserve MORE, that's logical. It can also be…
-
The time may be a ways away, but it's probably wise to acknowledge that eventually they will likely be a thing. People made that assumption with 7*s and they agonized about their release when the time came.
-
I would agree with this. Happiness isn't really a goal in these discussions for me. At least not in the overall sense. For me, it's about an optimal experience. Which means the effort lands somewhere in the vicinity of the reward. That reward also needs to be in balance to where a Player is at in the game. If a Player is…
-
They need to add incentive in the GC, such as Objectives. Otherwise people are going to hang out in the VT until the last minute as they've commonly done. Especially when you're talking Solo Rewards. Without that, that's just adding incentive for them to take advantage of the "easy Wins".