**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Because of this “temporary change” my top 2 champions ( rank 5 blade and killmonger) you basically are forcing me to play in tier 2/1 aw with a handicap. You seriously can’t just gimp a third of the good alliance war attackers just “to keep things fresh” seriously get more creative on that development team than just handicapping majority of the better champions for attack.
I don’t have any1 I want to rank down Yet I still feel people should have the option to do it when a change like this is made
Majority of the big money coming in for GMCs and top rank ups are made based on war because it offers the best rewards. I don’t think it was reasonable for anyone to expect full bleed immunity across the board when it’s the most common (by far) DOT. I’m all for an evolving meta but this isn’t random it’s very specifically targeted against what has become another imbalance problem.
There isn't an argument for a temporary change. It will go back normal in less than 6 weeks. They do that then the next global choice they will have to issue more and when it gets to the point of alliances picking their own globals, they'll have to give them out each time. Not only that, there are other game modes to consider. Bleed Champs are still effective in all other aspects.
ok. so i'd like to keep this simple. i like what they did but probably took a lot by surprise with this. This will give other alliances a chance at top rewards in war. But kabam has to be more creative than what they did. simply neutering efficient champs will really piss people off.
I'd say, adapt your roster and invest in various champs. If you do not have resources for now, sidelining is probably the smart thing to do. just bulk up your roster for the season after.
This is what they are trying to get you to do because at the state of the game, having god tier champs that can slay everything in it's path will stop those who have them from paying out or "investing" more. And they are in their right to do that. they are a business after all.
In that same sense, rdt's totally destroy the business mechanic. This totally denies them of potential earnings and to do so, it uses our previous investments (which is also their previous earnings). This is unfair to them.
Km, again, loses his bleed but guess what? He can still become unstoppable, still counterstrike or whatever, and he can still be a badass.
The people that are complaining about this bleed thing is acting as if they never fought against bleed immune champs before.
Major changes to the fundamental way Champs are intended to perform. Commonly known as nerfs. Buffs aren't the same. Don't know who would want one because their Champ is buffed either way. They're for major nerfs to the Champs themselves. We haven't seen any since 12.0. They're not for specific changes to content or to continually have the best Roster whenever something new comes.
Aside from that, they gave them as a surprise at Christmas to adjust our Roster for the upcoming year. Once. Personally, I don't think that was a good idea because it just led to more asking, but I have to respect it's their decision, and I see that their intentions were to do something nice for people. Nevertheless, in a year and a half plus, the response has been the same. In that same amount of time, the asking never stops, and anything introduced has become a plea for them.
I do know the history thanks for the recap.
A buff or a nerf are a change and kabam sure did not define the RDT condition as `a major nerf`, but a `major change`. Every champ that fights a buffed champs get affected if that's not true they would not have to keep ROL rhino `prebuff`. I recognize my opinion on this topic will never converge with yours but that doesn't matter. No difference when all the emergency maintenance and lagging happens and ppls asking for compensation because of lost items, lost AQ AW, 30 mins timer. The fact the requests keep popping up by different ppls means that this is either a strong discussion point or a demand from the community. The only thing I agree with is its kabam decision to make whether I respect it or not.
Did they specify? No. At the time those comments were made, they weren't in reference to a buff. They were specifying that it wasn't for any small or necessary change such as an exploit fix. They didn't say the word nerf. I did. That's exactly what they were talking about, in our words. They didn't mean for literally any change. A buff doesn't warrant RDTs, whether major or not.
Exactly so get a kabam mod to buy in to that otherwise it's just your opinion against mine.
In fact my hope is kabam can just say straight out that no more RDT will be issued ever again that will calm alot of the community and help me make my future spending decision on this game.
My opinion......hmm. Have a look at the months and months of requests, the situations they surrounded, and the responses from Moderation. I'm pretty sure it's apparent.