2015 rank gems > public enemy no:1

I would like to say that I m sorry for being honest and fair player who reported this issue to the Kabam. If I keep my mouth shut, many of you probably will use their gems without limitation. You said that only 0.008% people used their gems and there is no going back.
So okey then give other 99.992% players to rank up gem without limitation. This should be simple and fair solution.

Once again, Marvel community, i am sorry for being honest and fair.

Comments

Jdub

Meh wait till you get that they resolved the issue and close this thread because they don’t like conflict of whales interest.

TitanPunch

Anyone knows how many players we are taking about when Kabam says 0.008%?

Demonzfyre

TitanPunch wrote: »

Anyone knows how many players we are taking about when Kabam says 0.008%?

Not many. Like a handful.

Jdub

If we have a million players it’s 8k

Midknight007

TitanPunch wrote: »

Anyone knows how many players we are taking about when Kabam says 0.008%?

Minimal enough to overlook the use of an exploit.

Midknight007

Jdub wrote: »

If we have a million players it’s 8k

Now, adjust that for alt accounts and accounts that haven’t had a login for the past 3 months... it is around 80ish.

GroundedWisdom

It's 80 to begin with. 0.008 of 1,000,000 is 80.

Irohr

I withdraw my statement.

Midknight007

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

It's 80 to begin with. 0.008 of 1,000,000 is 80.

I was being sarcastic... you know that, right?

Midknight007

Also... it is only 0.008% of people who could access the content (ie met the level 40 requirement)... it may be closer to around 12-15.

Doomsfist79

This has been addressed and dealt with as far as Kabam is concerned.. and in all honesty that's really all that matters. Rather than people continuing to make posts that are going to be closed or removed. People can simply not spend for Black Friday and Cyber Monday.. I think that will send a much louder and clearer message than all the posts that have been made in regards to this issue. If no spending occurs until a solution or explanation that the majority of the community community can accept, then i'm pretty sre we'll see a resolution like 12.0 or the suggestion of removing diversity brought about. At the end of the day.. they are a company with the goal of making money.. which is far.. it's also fair that their customer base refuse to give them money until we are satisfied with aspects of the game we are unhappy about.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Kabam Mauve

Hey all. We understand your concerns but the solution isn't as easy as it seems. As we have made our statement on this matter in the original discussion, this thread will be closed.