why in the new update to changes only two champions are affected

There are a lot of champions in the game that need to be improved, new champions with great potential come out and the old ones go down, their problem must be solved

Comments

Timone147

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

googledmusic

Timone147 wrote: »

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

I agree with you, although everyone should be worked one by one.

LEGIONER

Timone147 wrote: »

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

I think that this is very unfair, players who have strong champions will not want the old ones to be affected by the changes.

googledmusic

LEGIONER wrote: »

Timone147 wrote: »

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

I think that this is very unfair, players who have strong champions will not want the old ones to be affected by the changes.

Well, anyone is not limited to do anything in this game, people can play with their own decisions.

Austin555555

It takes time to rework and other stuff for an update. 2 champs at a time is perfectly fine to rework

xNig

Because 2 is just nice. 3 is too many and 4 is a crowd. =P

GroundedWisdom

LEGIONER wrote: »

Timone147 wrote: »

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

I think that this is very unfair, players who have strong champions will not want the old ones to be affected by the changes.

I have yet to see a revision that makes newer Champs obsolete.

xNig

LEGIONER wrote: »

Timone147 wrote: »

They can only truly improve and test a couple champs at a time. It would be hard to change all champs and guarantee balance is maintained. The only time they did a large change was 12.0 and it caused a lot of issues. This was only done to help the future of the game too and not to help some champs get better.

I think that this is very unfair, players who have strong champions will not want the old ones to be affected by the changes.

Why not?

I've not seen a single complaint about Red Hulk, Venom, Carnage or Luke Cage being changed. Tbh, the changes were all marvellously done.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Mhykke

LEGIONER wrote: »

There are a lot of champions in the game that need to be improved, new champions with great potential come out and the old ones go down, their problem must be solved

I think it is probably something similar as to why we get 2 new champs a month and not 50.