War ratings are not fixed to specific tiers. Tiers are made up of X% to X% of alliances with war ratings. So if you are near the bottom a tier but more alliances below you won with a greater alliance war rating increase than you received from your win because their matchups were considered harder than yours....you can be pushed down a tier.
War ratings are not fixed to specific tiers. Tiers are made up of X% to X% of alliances with war ratings. So if you are near the bottom a tier but more alliances below you won with a greater alliance war rating increase than you received from your win because their matchups were considered harder than yours....you can be pushed down a tier.
Please elaborate what you think I'm wrong about and why. Just saying "That is not correct" doesn't help anyone.
The OP stated they were tier 16 and went down to 17. Here's a screenshot of what equates to that tier and their rewards. It shows a % not a static value.
And war rating win and defeat values also change depending on number of bgs and the war rating of opponents. So an alliance running 3 bgs winning against an opponent with a higher war rating will gain more points for a win vs an alliance running 2 bgs against an ally with a lower rating.
They both won but one is climbing faster. If enough alliances are climbing faster the threshold to move up a tier or stay in a tier is going to move up as well.
Comments
That is not correct
The OP stated they were tier 16 and went down to 17. Here's a screenshot of what equates to that tier and their rewards. It shows a % not a static value.
And war rating win and defeat values also change depending on number of bgs and the war rating of opponents. So an alliance running 3 bgs winning against an opponent with a higher war rating will gain more points for a win vs an alliance running 2 bgs against an ally with a lower rating.
They both won but one is climbing faster. If enough alliances are climbing faster the threshold to move up a tier or stay in a tier is going to move up as well.