**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Suggestion to deal with 4* issue in Act 6
phantom0206
Posts: 4 ★
In light of the Act 6 ban on 4*s/requirement for 5/6*s. I'd like to make a suggestion that you make 4*s as easy to get as 2*s. You could do this for uncollected or some other title level. Simply replace ALL 2* rewards and make them 4*. For example, the Sunday arena would be the same milestones, but award 4*s. All the arenas and events that currently give 2* shards for milestones would give 4* shards. Basically anywhere in the game that we see a 2* OR 2* shards today, would turn into 4* shards.
So how would this help?
It would rapidly increase end game players 5* rosters.
If you don't like this idea, make 5*s 2K shards instead of 10K. Make the featured 5* crystal 5K shards. Just make it way easier to build a 5* roster.
Another thought...
Allow us to rank up/down our rosters at will. If you are going to keep changing the requirements, we need the option to rank up/down to change with the times. Many players have spent the better part of a year or more investing in champs based on synergies. Now those champs have little or much less value if a key champ on their synergy team was a 4*. We made those decisions based on the state of the game. And nothing in the state of the game would have led us to think there would be a ban on 4*s. So we invested in them and their synergy partner 5s.
So how would this help?
It would rapidly increase end game players 5* rosters.
If you don't like this idea, make 5*s 2K shards instead of 10K. Make the featured 5* crystal 5K shards. Just make it way easier to build a 5* roster.
Another thought...
Allow us to rank up/down our rosters at will. If you are going to keep changing the requirements, we need the option to rank up/down to change with the times. Many players have spent the better part of a year or more investing in champs based on synergies. Now those champs have little or much less value if a key champ on their synergy team was a 4*. We made those decisions based on the state of the game. And nothing in the state of the game would have led us to think there would be a ban on 4*s. So we invested in them and their synergy partner 5s.
1