**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Trade items in lieu of gifting.
Player
Posts: 169 ★
I’m probably going to be shot down right out of the gate, but how about allowing those with permanent gifting to trade with others.
For example, I have a bunch of T4 Tech and have T2 alpha at maximum in my inventory but really want a Tech awakening gem. An alliance mate *has* a Tech awakening gem but needs t2 alpha.
Is there still a risk of abuse in this case? I understand that someone could use multiple accounts and share the resources with a single account, however, this is self limiting. Resources are harder to acquire without growing each of the accounts in question, thus continually sharing resources with a single account will leave the other accounts weaker and unable to progress further.
Furthermore, only items that can be aquired through the game or via cash purchases, versus with units could be traded in this way, limiting the potential abuse that is currently plaguing the gifting feature.
Just a thought.
For example, I have a bunch of T4 Tech and have T2 alpha at maximum in my inventory but really want a Tech awakening gem. An alliance mate *has* a Tech awakening gem but needs t2 alpha.
Is there still a risk of abuse in this case? I understand that someone could use multiple accounts and share the resources with a single account, however, this is self limiting. Resources are harder to acquire without growing each of the accounts in question, thus continually sharing resources with a single account will leave the other accounts weaker and unable to progress further.
Furthermore, only items that can be aquired through the game or via cash purchases, versus with units could be traded in this way, limiting the potential abuse that is currently plaguing the gifting feature.
Just a thought.
4
Comments
You could also impose a cost to trade. For example, a t1 alpha or a Basic T4 catalyst etc. to limit abuse.
Already been suggested too many times.