Pretty disgusting matchup. War matchmaking still sucks!

UnsungUnsung Member Posts: 42 ★
in General Discussion
This is our 4th matchup for the season. What a joke of a matchup. Do we even attack? And for tier4 matchup, is that fair? Wow

Comments

  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    Probably pretty limited alliances in the 2 battle group category. They may have missed a button and you got unlucky as you were the top of the 2s.
  • Dtl7714Dtl7714 Member Posts: 474 ★★★
    Matchmaking is broken. Been broken. They dont care
  • New_Noob168New_Noob168 Member Posts: 1,585 ★★★★
    Ya. We got paired with a team that we fought last war. Something is wrong with matchmaking
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,058 ★★★★★
    New_Noob168 said:

    Ya. We got paired with a team that we fought last war. Something is wrong with matchmaking

    Why does that mean its broken? If they are in the same bracket, it's possible to get paired again.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,058 ★★★★★
    Unsung said:

    This is our 4th matchup for the season. What a joke of a matchup. Do we even attack? And for tier4 matchup, is that fair? Wow

    Its 2 BGs and early on in the season. That was rating could be they are dropping due to being short handed. Its winnable as you are paired against 2 BGs only, not 3.
  • unknownunknown Member Posts: 378 ★
    Demonzfyre said:

    New_Noob168 said:

    Ya. We got paired with a team that we fought last war. Something is wrong with matchmaking

    Why does that mean its broken? If they are in the same bracket, it's possible to get paired again.
    right. they must use the same rng as they do on the crystals. that would explain a lot
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,672 ★★★★★
    Demonzfyre said:

    Unsung said:

    This is our 4th matchup for the season. What a joke of a matchup. Do we even attack? And for tier4 matchup, is that fair? Wow

    Its 2 BGs and early on in the season. That was rating could be they are dropping due to being short handed. Its winnable as you are paired against 2 BGs only, not 3.
    It's not winnable. The difference in the defenders will be huge as well as the attack teams. Unless they are next season's shell and are losing on purpose to lower the war rating.
  • KnightZeroKnightZero Member Posts: 1,450 ★★★★★
    Ordalca said:

    It's your own fault for doing 2 bg. You have 30 people, so could easily be fighting 3 bg much closer to your rating. Instead, you decided to go for 2 bg to try to get an advantage.

    On the other hand, MWO has 26 people, so they are in 2 bg legitimately. Don't try and blame Kabam when your attempt to cheese easy wins backfires.

    Lots of alliances do 2 BG for different reasons. Your assumption that they're doing 2 BG for an advantage is rubbish unless proven so.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UniroxUnirox Member Posts: 8
    War rating is nothing to be scared of. If anything ; I think it was pretty evenly matched.

    War rating just determines the multiplier... not the actual champs placed on the map.
  • Ultra8529Ultra8529 Member Posts: 526 ★★★
    Matchmaking is entirely broken. Apparently its possible for alliances at the top to get 2 "byes" back to back when Kabam's announcement said that they would be very rare and only for lower alliances since matchmaking will be fixed from the top down. By definition it means that the rank 1 alliance can never get a bye since it would matched first.
  • UniroxUnirox Member Posts: 8
    Well, Omni is now playing 2 groups cu they can’t beat 3 groups. You’ll see more and more allies doing this because of the match making.
Sign In or Register to comment.