They don't nerf champs because people like them and post about them on the forum. SMH
I got AA nerfed from a post. Think again.
Any changes that I can recall to AA were quite necessary and logical. For example, no Champ is supposed to bypass Stun Immunity. Someone may have pointed it out, but that's exactly why we're here. At least part of the reason. We can communicate issues with them. To be clear, simply posting about something won't prompt changes unless there's an issue that requires it.
ummm...the issue wasn't that people didn't think he needed changed, or that having a champion bypass stun immunity wasn't good for the game. People realized this was an issue when he was released and they figured out he could do that. They went for him and bought him and when this came out, they brought it here to the forum and directly asked the game team and moderators if he was supposed to be doing that, and if he was DESIGNED to do that. They confirmed it was working as intended and supposed to do that. So people took them at their word. A year later its not working as intended anymore, and changed. THAT'S what people were upset about.
He's still an amazing champion without this ability and anyone saying they didn't want him anymore wasn't being serious, but it's still the timeline and communication on the game team that people had an issue with, and it wasn't transparent or honest at all. And I said at the time it would create precedence for other similar changes...and for the last year, can anyone count how many times a champion has been released with something unintentional in their abilities - or even advertised as an ability, only to be changed a month later?
Context and history matters man. You left a lot out there.
They don't nerf champs because people like them and post about them on the forum. SMH
I got AA nerfed from a post. Think again.
Any changes that I can recall to AA were quite necessary and logical. For example, no Champ is supposed to bypass Stun Immunity. Someone may have pointed it out, but that's exactly why we're here. At least part of the reason. We can communicate issues with them. To be clear, simply posting about something won't prompt changes unless there's an issue that requires it.
ummm...the issue wasn't that people didn't think he needed changed, or that having a champion bypass stun immunity wasn't good for the game. People realized this was an issue when he was released and they figured out he could do that. They went for him and bought him and when this came out, they brought it here to the forum and directly asked the game team and moderators if he was supposed to be doing that, and if he was DESIGNED to do that. They confirmed it was working as intended and supposed to do that. So people took them at their word. A year later its not working as intended anymore, and changed. THAT'S what people were upset about.
He's still an amazing champion without this ability and anyone saying they didn't want him anymore wasn't being serious, but it's still the timeline and communication on the game team that people had an issue with, and it wasn't transparent or honest at all. And I said at the time it would create precedence for other similar changes...and for the last year, can anyone count how many times a champion has been released with something unintentional in their abilities - or even advertised as an ability, only to be changed a month later?
Context and history matters man. You left a lot out there.
They don't nerf champs because people like them and post about them on the forum. SMH
I got AA nerfed from a post. Think again.
Any changes that I can recall to AA were quite necessary and logical. For example, no Champ is supposed to bypass Stun Immunity. Someone may have pointed it out, but that's exactly why we're here. At least part of the reason. We can communicate issues with them. To be clear, simply posting about something won't prompt changes unless there's an issue that requires it.
ummm...the issue wasn't that people didn't think he needed changed, or that having a champion bypass stun immunity wasn't good for the game. People realized this was an issue when he was released and they figured out he could do that. They went for him and bought him and when this came out, they brought it here to the forum and directly asked the game team and moderators if he was supposed to be doing that, and if he was DESIGNED to do that. They confirmed it was working as intended and supposed to do that. So people took them at their word. A year later its not working as intended anymore, and changed. THAT'S what people were upset about.
He's still an amazing champion without this ability and anyone saying they didn't want him anymore wasn't being serious, but it's still the timeline and communication on the game team that people had an issue with, and it wasn't transparent or honest at all. And I said at the time it would create precedence for other similar changes...and for the last year, can anyone count how many times a champion has been released with something unintentional in their abilities - or even advertised as an ability, only to be changed a month later?
Context and history matters man. You left a lot out there.
Oh s###t here we go again
I mean I wasn't going to say anything to drag this back up, but I can't read someone comment about it without the full context. It's not like a bunch of us who have played this since 2015 weren't around when this all happened. It was a controversy for a reason. And it does relate to this post, where others have said "never say never" with changes to a champion. With quake I don't see it happening just like I don't with Blade. But i will never say "they wont do this" because it's been proven wrong before.
Comments
He's still an amazing champion without this ability and anyone saying they didn't want him anymore wasn't being serious, but it's still the timeline and communication on the game team that people had an issue with, and it wasn't transparent or honest at all. And I said at the time it would create precedence for other similar changes...and for the last year, can anyone count how many times a champion has been released with something unintentional in their abilities - or even advertised as an ability, only to be changed a month later?
Context and history matters man. You left a lot out there.
I just r4 my 5* and I've been using her non stop in AW against Psychic Thorns, Evades, Autoblock, Biohazard nodes, I am thinking of bringing her to r5