Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking.
Again, explain why we've had Spider-Men, X-Men, etc in the game FOR YEARS despite the fact that Marvel Studios didn't have the movie rights at the time.
They weighed benefit vs deficit of their inclusion and decided to let them in. Spider-Man is the most popular character Marvel has and Wolverine could make an argument for second; their exclusion would be noticed by the fans. It doesn’t change the fact that when a character isn’t fully owned by Disney the scales are weighted against them.
That's hilarious. Storm Iceman Psylocke Archangel Bishop Rogue Omega Red X-23 Colossus Cable Beast Rhino Spider-Gwen Miles Morales Agent Venom Iron Patriot (Norman Osborne, they could use the Rhodey version) Sentinel Venom Carnage Black-Suit Spidey Magik Scarlet Witch
Marvel Studios/Disney didn't own the rights fully/at all to ANY of these characters at the time of their release. You're argument is entirely invalid and pointless.
Disney owns all of those characters just not the rights to their movies. As stated earlier they weigh the benefits and act according. If Disney doesn’t own the movie rights they tend to lean towards exclusion. This isn’t an argument of opinion, it’s a statement of fact.
Disney/Marvel own the rights to EVERY MARVEL CHARACTER. They just don't own some of the movie rights. Including now owning the Spidey movie rights. In other words ... we get characters regardless of their movie rights. Which was my original argument, which you disagreed with. Case closed.
Comments
It's a mutually beneficial relationship for both parties.
MARVEL
CHARACTER.
They just don't own some of the movie rights. Including now owning the Spidey movie rights. In other words ... we get characters regardless of their movie rights. Which was my original argument, which you disagreed with.
Case closed.