Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking. Again, explain why we've had Spider-Men, X-Men, etc in the game FOR YEARS despite the fact that Marvel Studios didn't have the movie rights at the time. They weighed benefit vs deficit of their inclusion and decided to let them in. Spider-Man is the most popular character Marvel has and Wolverine could make an argument for second; their exclusion would be noticed by the fans. It doesn’t change the fact that when a character isn’t fully owned by Disney the scales are weighted against them. That's hilarious. StormIcemanPsylockeArchangelBishopRogueOmega RedX-23ColossusCableBeastRhinoSpider-GwenMiles MoralesAgent VenomIron Patriot (Norman Osborne, they could use the Rhodey version)SentinelVenomCarnageBlack-Suit SpideyMagikScarlet WitchMarvel Studios/Disney didn't own the rights fully/at all to ANY of these characters at the time of their release. You're argument is entirely invalid and pointless. Disney owns all of those characters just not the rights to their movies. As stated earlier they weigh the benefits and act according. If Disney doesn’t own the movie rights they tend to lean towards exclusion. This isn’t an argument of opinion, it’s a statement of fact.
Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking. Again, explain why we've had Spider-Men, X-Men, etc in the game FOR YEARS despite the fact that Marvel Studios didn't have the movie rights at the time. They weighed benefit vs deficit of their inclusion and decided to let them in. Spider-Man is the most popular character Marvel has and Wolverine could make an argument for second; their exclusion would be noticed by the fans. It doesn’t change the fact that when a character isn’t fully owned by Disney the scales are weighted against them. That's hilarious. StormIcemanPsylockeArchangelBishopRogueOmega RedX-23ColossusCableBeastRhinoSpider-GwenMiles MoralesAgent VenomIron Patriot (Norman Osborne, they could use the Rhodey version)SentinelVenomCarnageBlack-Suit SpideyMagikScarlet WitchMarvel Studios/Disney didn't own the rights fully/at all to ANY of these characters at the time of their release. You're argument is entirely invalid and pointless.
Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking. Again, explain why we've had Spider-Men, X-Men, etc in the game FOR YEARS despite the fact that Marvel Studios didn't have the movie rights at the time. They weighed benefit vs deficit of their inclusion and decided to let them in. Spider-Man is the most popular character Marvel has and Wolverine could make an argument for second; their exclusion would be noticed by the fans. It doesn’t change the fact that when a character isn’t fully owned by Disney the scales are weighted against them.
Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking. Again, explain why we've had Spider-Men, X-Men, etc in the game FOR YEARS despite the fact that Marvel Studios didn't have the movie rights at the time.
Another thing; if movie rights don’t affect the game why on earth do we have two versions of MCU Spider-Man? Do you really think, if Sony went their separate way with Spider-Man, that we’d be getting another version of Peter Parker or any character Sony owns the movie rights to? Come on bro, do some critical thinking.