Comment on diversify of attackers and defenders in war

rwhackrwhack Member Posts: 1,061 ★★★
Ahem, the reason diversity is not something you see but want @kabam is that you have maybe 20% of the heroes that are any good at either. It’s not the lack of globals to make terrible heroes worthy of a rank up.

To make it worse you too a large collection of heroes no one would rank up as a 5 star and made them available for RNG rage quits as a 6 star.

There are way too many 6 stars that are terrible. Meanwhile ones we like (quake, AA, etc) will never be. Yet we have Beast, Daredevil, Karnak, Loki, Jane Foster, both cyclops (both terrible), both magnetos, gamora, drax, moon knight, ironman, superior ironman (two duplicates like magneto), captain marvel, war machine, winter soldier, storm, etc.

Why put garbage in the 6 stars with the accumulation rate we have?

So poorly considered.

Comments

  • rwhackrwhack Member Posts: 1,061 ★★★
    I see Griounded Wisdom has read and disagreed. LOL
  • beaupoembeaupoem Member Posts: 443
    i came in here thinking it was going to be about diversity in war. but tried to read the post and... i think it's about something else? i'm not too sure
Sign In or Register to comment.