Let's not put any deff at war deff

Until kabam resolved this matter, let's not put any deff at all at war deff.

Comments

  • Crimson8399Crimson8399 Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    That would be great.
  • Ace13aAce13a Member Posts: 3
    Seriously, losing because the other guys didn't put in defense is stupid. Both got 100% but they won because we didn't get as many attacker kills as them because they didn't put them in.
  • sn8kblacksn8kblack Member Posts: 28
    That's what I think too, not put any def and make all people happy right, players don't have to buy any pot and rev, don't have to be disappointed if lose, can focus on act 5.3 etc
  • This content has been removed.
  • 007_Link007_Link Member Posts: 16
    Someone crunched the numbers, and currently the only way that placing defenders would award more points than the attacker kills the enemy gains is if you place 107 unique champs... the problem is that there aren't 107 unique champs in he game. You literally will win every war if you don't place any champs and get 100% exploration (which isn't that hard). Soon enough no one is ever going to place any defense, and every war will result in a tie.
  • BigDaddyJoeBigDaddyJoe Member Posts: 357 ★★
    8turcmgahmxu.png
  • sn8kblacksn8kblack Member Posts: 28
    Zero Def FTW
  • Speeds80Speeds80 Member Posts: 2,017 ★★★★
    I've considered this but We're in tier 4 and we've won our first two by placing strong defense and the other alliance not getting both boss kills, this is just because they weren't prepared to spend though really and once we catch a spend alliance this won't happen, honestly I'm calling his war system the worst move in game since the first god tier nerf, and probably worse than what the nerf ended up being when they addressed it because of the boycott (and mass refunds)
  • This content has been removed.
  • The_Savage_AncientThe_Savage_Ancient Member Posts: 134
    8turcmgahmxu.png

    @Kabam Miike can you have a look at this please, there is also another thread going where players are now not placing all defenders but still winning. https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/21162/fundamental-flaw-to-aw-scoring#latest
  • MightylibraMightylibra Member Posts: 185
    Haha, you have been warned, Kabam. But all you did is showing disrespect toward community base, deleting discusion thread, ignoring our opinions. Now, AW will end with 100% for both sides, no hard feeling for losing, hah?

    No one is gonna place defenders because defenders that we worked so hard to get and level up now count for nothing and are replaced by **** defenders for the sake of diversity.

    The easiest way to fix it is to roll back to the old rules with defenders kill points and remove the stupid diversity system. They were not a perfect rules, but they are working ones. If it ain't broke, don't fix.

    Having said that, it's Kabam we are talking about. They probably cause even more broken rules. The level of stupidity can be limitless.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,575 ★★★★★
    If you think this is going to be some kind of protest, its not likely to end in Defender Kills coming back. If anything, they could make Placement mandatory. History states that reverting something is not the usual response. All you're doing is ambushing people out of a fair fight because they Placed and you didn't.
  • sn8kblacksn8kblack Member Posts: 28
    Take a look at this

    j3y0jptb1ptc.jpg
  • MightylibraMightylibra Member Posts: 185
    edited September 2017
    No protest, It's just funny. We actually placed defenders over the last two wars then I found this thread. So please tell me how is it fair when we got 100% exploration vs 100% of the opponents while getting far more def kills than they did but ended up in a loss because they had "diversity".

    Diversity is a nice thing to have in Aw. However, rather than creating more good defenders so that we can naturally diversify the defense setup. Kabam force us to place **** ones. When placing 3/30 Gwen Spidey instead of 5/50 Dorm can get you a win, it's better not to place at all.
  • edited September 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • sn8kblacksn8kblack Member Posts: 28
    So they still doesn't want to react about this matter
Sign In or Register to comment.