**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

Some relative damage I did for fun

TP33TP33 Posts: 1,577 ★★★★
So I’ve got some champions, not much to do, some stuff I want to know. So I run into ROL with one champion at a time and give myself 100 seconds to do the fight. After 100 seconds I quit out. Take note of the damage I’ve done, and then put it into a table to find out relative damage.



I define “relative damage” as the damage dealt in the 100 seconds per base attack point, essentially using these calculations you could figure out the approximate time it would take to do a fight with that champion at any rank or level. My results pool was limited but I’ll try to do every champ in game (might be hard with those I only have 2* though)

Hyperion placed first, he has low base attack and does massive damage with heavy spam -L2 - L3 combos. Of course Hyperion is an RNG dependant champion, I could’ve theoretically done worse or better, however the RNG j got in the fight I would define as average

Archangel next, big boi damage. In fact he finished the fight in 98 seconds but I’ll just count it as I got some decent RNG.

CMM third. Didn’t use energy synergies and she still slapped, nearly ran out of binary towards the end. Also I got pretty bad Armour break RNG, like 4/5 max

HT was a good fight, when doing calculations I did factor in class advantage/disadvantage (didn’t write it for AA but if you do the math you’ll realise the numbers don’t match, that’s why)

Stealthy didn’t surprise me, he has good damage but nothing extraordinary (he’s unduped as well)

BWDO, a newer champ for me and boy was I surprised, damage on par with Stealthy, didn’t land many intercepts mainly due to passive AI but was still more than happy with the result

The rest underperformed but are still decent champions. Warlock got 0 heavy crits which really knocked his damage down and if I did it again I’m sure I could squeeze out at least 80/90. Sorcerer Supreme didn’t have any buffs to nullify so not many specials and in turn armour break. Only champion to finish on a full yellow bar though (even though I got hit 4 times going in after a heavy and he L1s)

Overall I think this is an interesting concept. 0 synergies, ROL WS no boosts and just raw numbers in the end. Kind of an unbiased, fair, damage test. I’d love to see ones for champs like Ghost, Quake, NF so I might try them later on.

Comments

  • magnus_xixmagnus_xix Posts: 2,018 ★★★★★
    This doesn't really do ramp up champions any justice.
Sign In or Register to comment.