We apologise for any miscommunication along the way. We will be sure to pass this feedback along to the team for future reference. Thank you.
We apologise for any miscommunication along the way. We will be sure to pass this feedback along to the team for future reference. Thank you. It’s not miscommunication, it’s no communication. That’s different.
We apologise for any miscommunication along the way. We will be sure to pass this feedback along to the team for future reference. Thank you. It’s not miscommunication, it’s no communication. That’s different. Despite my strong differing opinion to you earlier, definitely agree.
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff Exactly, besides this isn’t that big of a change either. The only champion affected was NF and it wasn’t even suppose to affect him. This is like the Morningstar interaction and people calling it a “nerf” all over again Well any fury affects him regardless of it being passive or active so if there was a fury it was supposed to affect him. The dev team just didn't think of it and apparently didn't pay attention to beta testing videos or forum posts. There was a post before where even with a fury icon nick wasn't retaining his charges because the fury was neither passive not a buff. I think it was meant to be a fury like that and the change might be warranted. But it's bad eitherway for no communication. And a question, if your 6* nick died and cane back, did he lose the fury?
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff Exactly, besides this isn’t that big of a change either. The only champion affected was NF and it wasn’t even suppose to affect him. This is like the Morningstar interaction and people calling it a “nerf” all over again Well any fury affects him regardless of it being passive or active so if there was a fury it was supposed to affect him. The dev team just didn't think of it and apparently didn't pay attention to beta testing videos or forum posts.
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff Exactly, besides this isn’t that big of a change either. The only champion affected was NF and it wasn’t even suppose to affect him. This is like the Morningstar interaction and people calling it a “nerf” all over again
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff Exactly, besides this isn’t that big of a change either. The only champion affected was NF and it wasn’t even suppose to affect him. This is like the Morningstar interaction and people calling it a “nerf” all over again Well any fury affects him regardless of it being passive or active so if there was a fury it was supposed to affect him. The dev team just didn't think of it and apparently didn't pay attention to beta testing videos or forum posts. There was a post before where even with a fury icon nick wasn't retaining his charges because the fury was neither passive not a buff. I think it was meant to be a fury like that and the change might be warranted. But it's bad eitherway for no communication. And a question, if your 6* nick died and cane back, did he lose the fury? Did he lose what fury? Asking how did he work in 7.1 prior to the update? If so, no the passive fury was always there are the start of any fight I mean when he were to die in real nick phase
Haha that’s a dirty play by kabam lmaoSneaky buggers Stop blaming everything on kabam and thinking that it was done on purpose. It’s probably just a mistake Lol Yes, but I feel the same way personally. I'd rather get confirmation on things before overreacting to everything and assuming something was done as opposed to broken.This is still somewhat disappointing but overall not massive. Just makes it a bit harder to defend stuff Exactly, besides this isn’t that big of a change either. The only champion affected was NF and it wasn’t even suppose to affect him. This is like the Morningstar interaction and people calling it a “nerf” all over again Well any fury affects him regardless of it being passive or active so if there was a fury it was supposed to affect him. The dev team just didn't think of it and apparently didn't pay attention to beta testing videos or forum posts. There was a post before where even with a fury icon nick wasn't retaining his charges because the fury was neither passive not a buff. I think it was meant to be a fury like that and the change might be warranted. But it's bad eitherway for no communication. And a question, if your 6* nick died and cane back, did he lose the fury? Did he lose what fury? Asking how did he work in 7.1 prior to the update? If so, no the passive fury was always there are the start of any fight