It’s based off of how many reactions you receive. Disagrees and Lols count for 0 points, agrees, insightfuls, likes, and awesomes count for +1 points each, and guardians who are basically mini mods can flag for spam and abuse which is -1 points.
It’s worth mentioning that the points and star rating mean nothing but to show how much time each user wastes on the forums.
It’s based off of how many reactions you receive. Disagrees and Lols count for 0 points, agrees, insightfuls, likes, and awesomes count for +1 points each, and guardians who are basically mini mods can flag for spam and abuse which is -1 points.
It’s worth mentioning that the points and star rating mean nothing but to show how much time each user wastes on the forums.
It’s based off of how many reactions you receive. Disagrees and Lols count for 0 points, agrees, insightfuls, likes, and awesomes count for +1 points each, and guardians who are basically mini mods can flag for spam and abuse which is -1 points.
It’s worth mentioning that the points and star rating mean nothing but to show how much time each user wastes on the forums.
This is 100% accurate.
Dr. Zola
Not 100% accurate, I mean, look at your disagree/agree ratio compared to someone like... well pretty much everyone. It definitely shows a general idea of who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't.
Well, I appreciate the comment. But I should clarify the “wasting time” part is particularly accurate!
Dr. Zola
Wow, I never noticed you have less than 1000 disagrees. If that doesn't prove you're credible, I'm not sure what could.
Dang I hit 1k just yesterday loll. Rip my accreditation
It’s based off of how many reactions you receive. Disagrees and Lols count for 0 points, agrees, insightfuls, likes, and awesomes count for +1 points each, and guardians who are basically mini mods can flag for spam and abuse which is -1 points.
It’s worth mentioning that the points and star rating mean nothing but to show how much time each user wastes on the forums.
This is 100% accurate.
Dr. Zola
Not 100% accurate, I mean, look at your disagree/agree ratio compared to someone like... well pretty much everyone. It definitely shows a general idea of who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't.
Well, I appreciate the comment. But I should clarify the “wasting time” part is particularly accurate!
Dr. Zola
Wow, I never noticed you have less than 1000 disagrees. If that doesn't prove you're credible, I'm not sure what could.
Dang I hit 1k just yesterday loll. Rip my accreditation
iHulk's awesome, but I'm pretty sure him and disagree spammers count for like 4k of my disagrees
Comments
It’s worth mentioning that the points and star rating mean nothing but to show how much time each user wastes on the forums.
Dr. Zola
Asking for a friend....