New AW model is highly detrimental to 2 BG AW alliances
Haji_Saab
Member Posts: 5,837 ★★★★★
Current AW win = 50,000 points (this is same for both 2 BG and 3 BG alliances)
New AW win = 30,000 points
And more points for exploration. Now, the thing is that there is more to explore in 3 BG as compared to 2 BG.
Currently, for a 2BG alliance, if you win everything (as we do
) you can place in platinum 2. With the new scoring system, we will be lucky to place in platinum 3 and most likely will fall to platinum 4. For other 2 BG alliances, who win 50% of their matches, they are looking at Gold 1, plat 4 now even if they are in playing tier 1, 2 wars.
Just something to consider for 2 BG alliances.
New AW win = 30,000 points
And more points for exploration. Now, the thing is that there is more to explore in 3 BG as compared to 2 BG.
Currently, for a 2BG alliance, if you win everything (as we do
) you can place in platinum 2. With the new scoring system, we will be lucky to place in platinum 3 and most likely will fall to platinum 4. For other 2 BG alliances, who win 50% of their matches, they are looking at Gold 1, plat 4 now even if they are in playing tier 1, 2 wars. Just something to consider for 2 BG alliances.
9
Comments
There should be a higher reward for higher risk with 3 BGs than for 2.
And yeah still we can maintain Gold 2 next season as we have solid skillful guys and I am addressing how it will affect us not giving excuses and the alliance who run two bg can understand it easily.
If you think that you make people work by forcing them to do wars for 1 month in the lower tier bracket when you have option to rotate everybody by giving them minimum stress then you are taking this game more seriously where you do care more about this game war system (where even high tier skilled players get bored and burnt and they join lower tier alliance to relax) than your supportive alliance mates.
I am not that type of guy!
You’re stressing over gold bracket rewards? How do you think people get higher bracket rewards? By winning wars and moving up. If you want to complain about effort vs reward then put more effort in for more rewards. P3/4 is definitely easier to snag now a days with an organized alliance putting in 100% effort.
Again, as I stated at the beginning the only problem is you.
Seems like you are from another planet who don't know about alliance which plays with 2 bg only.Many of them in Gold 1 too.
You saw another example where platinum 2 with 2 bg war as with current system it is all about points and ratings.I can't say how is it fair for 2 bg alliance to stay in Plat 2 in comparison to 3 bg as we don't have any actual data about the no. of these alliances.
And people who are feeling it unfair were the same who whine that match is fair if you have similar war rating.And if you moved up by defeating the tougher opponents then why it should be a problem.
I know with 3 bg it is easier to maintain ranks and there was already a benefit with playing 3 bg war and I am not taking it like arena changes.I will wait and see how it will affect us and every alliance have different perspective about how they want to play wars and definitely we are not changing to the three bg as I know the stress of war either you claim it is not stressful or it is doesn't change it's fact.
We run 1bg wars and finish G2. I'm sure if we ran 2bg wars we would easily hit Platinum. We stay in tier 3-4 so our mltiplier if pretty high.