4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all you really want is for them to change a description
I want them to keep to what they sold us. The unlocking of all the benefits of what we are subscribing to.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all this talk from u is for the name of the sigil. Nothing else, technicalities,
And BTW u get what u pay for when u buy it as a UC player same goes for TB.. UC pay for the benefit of sigil plus a 6star sw in 6 months and tb pay for the sigil benefits plus sw in 4 months.. Because they don't have different names it doesn't change that
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all you really want is for them to change a description
I want them to keep to what they sold us. The unlocking of all the benefits of what we are subscribing to.
From day 1 the solo event had different items in it based on progression levels. This is exactly the same as it's always been.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all this talk from u is for the name of the sigil. Nothing else, technicalities,
And BTW u get what u pay for when u buy it as a UC player same goes for TB.. UC pay for the benefit of sigil plus a 6star sw in 6 months and tb pay for the sigil benefits plus sw in 4 months.. Because they don't have different names it doesn't change that
The point is they are selling 1 thing, Sigil which is subscription to unlock everything that Sigil has to offer.
If Sigil offers more, then you get more.
If they are selling something to another player based on their progression, then that should be something different.
So no people that are not UC or CAV are not getting what they paid for with the current model if there are things which are part of the sigil subscription they do not also get.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all this talk from u is for the name of the sigil. Nothing else, technicalities,
And BTW u get what u pay for when u buy it as a UC player same goes for TB.. UC pay for the benefit of sigil plus a 6star sw in 6 months and tb pay for the sigil benefits plus sw in 4 months.. Because they don't have different names it doesn't change that
The point is they are selling 1 thing, Sigil which is subscription to unlock everything that Sigil has to offer.
If Sigil offers more, then you get more.
If they are selling something to another player based on their progression, then that should be something different.
So no people that are not UC or CAV are not getting what they paid for with the current model if there are things which are part of the sigil subscription they do not also get.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all you really want is for them to change a description
I want them to keep to what they sold us. The unlocking of all the benefits of what we are subscribing to.
From day 1 the solo event had different items in it based on progression levels. This is exactly the same as it's always been.
Workinprogress gave u the answer, I am sorry but unfortunately u don't make sense anymore, it just look like u are hurt you are getting sw couple months later than others
Truly don’t really care. 4 stars don’t mean anything to me anymore other that getting shards and ISO’s. This discussion went way into a stratosphere I wasn’t expecting. So I get her when I get her.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
It technically is different subscriptions. Thronebreaker for thronebreakers Cavalier for cavlier etc.
Except it's not, when we were sold Sigil, it was to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
You are not missing anything. He just doesn't get it
The big difference here is it is 1 subscription to unlock all the benefits of Sigil.
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
U are not taking account the balance of the game.. Uncollected players don't need a new 6star, 5star will help them, TB don't care much about 5stars but they wouldn't mind a new 6star.. If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Then make it different subscriptions.
Cannot make different subscriptions. Because different progression levels have different value per each resource.. UC can get a 5star for 5 usd and be happy but TB wouldn't. If they make 6star for 20 usd so TB be happy, why pay more just to be happy, punished for progressing or because they are playing more?
Sure they can, they make a TB Sigil subscription.... they can even charge the same if they want, the fact is when you buy sigil, you are making a purchase to unlock all of benefits of Sigil.
So if they make 2 sigil, one named tb sigil an other UC sigil Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
Yes because the promise is you unlock all of the benefits of what you subscribed to.
So all this talk from u is for the name of the sigil. Nothing else, technicalities,
And BTW u get what u pay for when u buy it as a UC player same goes for TB.. UC pay for the benefit of sigil plus a 6star sw in 6 months and tb pay for the sigil benefits plus sw in 4 months.. Because they don't have different names it doesn't change that
The point is they are selling 1 thing, Sigil which is subscription to unlock everything that Sigil has to offer.
If Sigil offers more, then you get more.
If they are selling something to another player based on their progression, then that should be something different.
So no people that are not UC or CAV are not getting what they paid for with the current model if there are things which are part of the sigil subscription they do not also get.
I get what you are saying, but I think the main difference is that the sigil primarily gives you access to the black market. Once you have access to the black market, you are then given access to items based on your level of progression. A newbie player can still gain access to all items by unlocking progression levels like everyone else. There is no pay wall to stop a newbie from becoming UC, Cavalier, or TB; it is available for everyone. Simply put in the time and effort like everybody else. The sigil was not meant to be a bypass for player progression.
4 for uncollected 6 for cavalier 9 for thronebreaker
Well this is BS... if people are paying the same amount of money for a service, they should get the same level of treatment...
I hope to see you on 4th of July too when TB gets 6* Nexuses in deals and UC gets 5* shards for same amount.
Those are not a subscriptions to a level of service.
It's an optional service that isn't necessary for any part of the game at all.
Sigil though is a subscription to a level of service... if someone pays for it, it should unlock everything in that level of service regardless of progression.
Package deals are not a subscription.
So if the Odin's offer on July 4th gave 10k 6* shards, a t6b, a t3a and a t5cc selector (for example), it's fine if that's only offered to TB, and lower levels got less for the same amount of money.
But if those exact same rewards were offered as a 10 day subscription, each day giving 1/10th of the rewards, then it would be a problem if that wasn't offered to all players at the same price?
What am I missing that makes this not completely nonsensical?
But yes I do agree they should be giving the same if you are paying the same amount.
TB players pay with more time into the game compared to beginners
Comments
Make different subscriptions if they are going to be offering different levels of subscriptions
If they were giving TB sigil rewards, and resources from offers for that matter, it would destroy the balance and natural progression of the game.. And u can't keep giving uncollected offers or rewards to TB, because they won't buy it
Both cost 10 usd but one it give 4 of the new currency and other 9,you will be OK?
And BTW u get what u pay for when u buy it as a UC player same goes for TB.. UC pay for the benefit of sigil plus a 6star sw in 6 months and tb pay for the sigil benefits plus sw in 4 months.. Because they don't have different names it doesn't change that
If Sigil offers more, then you get more.
If they are selling something to another player based on their progression, then that should be something different.
So no people that are not UC or CAV are not getting what they paid for with the current model if there are things which are part of the sigil subscription they do not also get.