I retired and am an officer of a noob alliance. I don't deserve a title, and quite frankly, don't need a title. My satisfaction is found in watching people throw r5 5*s at my boss island and still dying a ton in war.
Seriously, have in-game recognition is a dumb idea. Even if it was only good alliances who achieved something, what would that implementation look like? Would it be the alliances that are #1 war and AQ? By that point, there really is no need for a title since they get one anyways.
I haven't thought thoroughly about implementation. But like some aw tier and aq score would be considered and for how long the alliance maybe running?
Like some alliance reach plat 1 for 1 season and next season whole alliance falls.
Alliance leaders running alliances for 2 years or more isn't a joke.
Again, implementation of that will be horrendous. There are over 16,000 alliances in the game, and doing something like that would be calculating a lot of data over the past 2 years for each alliance. This would be something needed to be done regularly, which would take a ton of time, and also put a lot of strain on server. The servers are fragile enough as is, and I don't think it would be worth the time and money to implement this. I recommend finding self-satisfaction over an in-game incentive.
We have alliance establishment date on alliance details given. And each season performance is also shown. Will not be easy to implement off course but not be very hectic either i guess
How on earth appreciating efforts of leaders and officers with just a title takes away the idea of teammwork?
Pls enlighten me.
The Alliance plays as a team, wins as a team, loses as a team, it's a team game mode. Officers and Leaders are trusted servants. Not employees. They don't deserve any more special treatment than anyone else. How would that feel for the other Members?
Comments
Pls enlighten me.