Options
Rank Cap option in Friendly Battlegrounds

Was thinking about how to properly host an unofficial tournament for friendly battlegrounds, but it seems pretty difficult with whales slaughtering f2p cavs... Theres obviously a few options to circumvent to this, but none of them have presented a good solution.
1. Set a limit of 5 stars only
- The game has evolved at a rate where 5 stars are useless, most thronebreakers in have less than 20 r5s in their roster. Paragons and up also only focus on ranking their 6 star version of the champ over the 5 star, making them leave their best 5 star champs unleveled.
2. Bracket Players by progression, and take the highest fight score between the final 3 standing in each bracket. (uncollected-cav) (thronebreaker) (paragon)
- Cant do this because of how massive the roster gap is between thronebreakers, and highest fight score being kinda hard to compare between the 3 brackets
3. Set a limit of 3/4 stars only
- Almost nobody who doesnt do arena has even 10 max 4 stars, and it pisses people off that they would have to waste resources to rank up champions they wont use outside friendly tournaments
4. No cap, ffa
- Leaves a poor mentality of rich get richer since its basically p2w with the most r4s win the tournament
Overall, i feel like a rank cap would solve all of this, perhaps leaving all 5*s at minimum r5 and 6*s at max r2 s200. This would allow players to have more fun and more fair battlegrounds matches. What do you guys think?
1. Set a limit of 5 stars only
- The game has evolved at a rate where 5 stars are useless, most thronebreakers in have less than 20 r5s in their roster. Paragons and up also only focus on ranking their 6 star version of the champ over the 5 star, making them leave their best 5 star champs unleveled.
2. Bracket Players by progression, and take the highest fight score between the final 3 standing in each bracket. (uncollected-cav) (thronebreaker) (paragon)
- Cant do this because of how massive the roster gap is between thronebreakers, and highest fight score being kinda hard to compare between the 3 brackets
3. Set a limit of 3/4 stars only
- Almost nobody who doesnt do arena has even 10 max 4 stars, and it pisses people off that they would have to waste resources to rank up champions they wont use outside friendly tournaments
4. No cap, ffa
- Leaves a poor mentality of rich get richer since its basically p2w with the most r4s win the tournament
Overall, i feel like a rank cap would solve all of this, perhaps leaving all 5*s at minimum r5 and 6*s at max r2 s200. This would allow players to have more fun and more fair battlegrounds matches. What do you guys think?
1
Comments