Options
Rank Cap option in Friendly Battlegrounds
ZacTheSword
Member Posts: 63 ★★
Was thinking about how to properly host an unofficial tournament for friendly battlegrounds, but it seems pretty difficult with whales slaughtering f2p cavs... Theres obviously a few options to circumvent to this, but none of them have presented a good solution.
1. Set a limit of 5 stars only
- The game has evolved at a rate where 5 stars are useless, most thronebreakers in have less than 20 r5s in their roster. Paragons and up also only focus on ranking their 6 star version of the champ over the 5 star, making them leave their best 5 star champs unleveled.
2. Bracket Players by progression, and take the highest fight score between the final 3 standing in each bracket. (uncollected-cav) (thronebreaker) (paragon)
- Cant do this because of how massive the roster gap is between thronebreakers, and highest fight score being kinda hard to compare between the 3 brackets
3. Set a limit of 3/4 stars only
- Almost nobody who doesnt do arena has even 10 max 4 stars, and it pisses people off that they would have to waste resources to rank up champions they wont use outside friendly tournaments
4. No cap, ffa
- Leaves a poor mentality of rich get richer since its basically p2w with the most r4s win the tournament
Overall, i feel like a rank cap would solve all of this, perhaps leaving all 5*s at minimum r5 and 6*s at max r2 s200. This would allow players to have more fun and more fair battlegrounds matches. What do you guys think?
1. Set a limit of 5 stars only
- The game has evolved at a rate where 5 stars are useless, most thronebreakers in have less than 20 r5s in their roster. Paragons and up also only focus on ranking their 6 star version of the champ over the 5 star, making them leave their best 5 star champs unleveled.
2. Bracket Players by progression, and take the highest fight score between the final 3 standing in each bracket. (uncollected-cav) (thronebreaker) (paragon)
- Cant do this because of how massive the roster gap is between thronebreakers, and highest fight score being kinda hard to compare between the 3 brackets
3. Set a limit of 3/4 stars only
- Almost nobody who doesnt do arena has even 10 max 4 stars, and it pisses people off that they would have to waste resources to rank up champions they wont use outside friendly tournaments
4. No cap, ffa
- Leaves a poor mentality of rich get richer since its basically p2w with the most r4s win the tournament
Overall, i feel like a rank cap would solve all of this, perhaps leaving all 5*s at minimum r5 and 6*s at max r2 s200. This would allow players to have more fun and more fair battlegrounds matches. What do you guys think?
1
Comments