Please tell me how we got outplayed? We won this war on every level except the one that they said would only be the decider in a tiebreaker. We were not tied.
No, you didn’t win. Your diversity is only 108, which means your alliance chose to place tough defenders on nodes. You may outkilled their attackers but they won fair and square. Diversity should be always maxed out under new rules, and the tie breaker is def rating, not def diversity.
You didn’t place diverse defenders, so you chose to lose. Look at how we did lose as well, THIS is painful, when you did everything possible yet you lose
As much as I hate the new format of AW, I got to say that as soon as def kills become tie breaker, def diversity will disappear and we will see Magik, Dorm, Hype, Mephisto,etc,. flooding AwD all over again. They are mutually exclusive and Kabam has chosen diversity.
So what? AW has been playing differently across tiers, thus tie breaker is also different depending on which tier you are playing. As of now, def rating is tie breaker in tier 1 and 2.
I understand what you’re saying. And if it wasn’t for the fact that we beat them in 3 other categories then it wouldn’t bother me so much. But this just seems ridiculous.
You didn’t place diverse defenders, so you chose to lose. Look at how we did lose as well, THIS is painful, when you did everything possible yet you lose
Curios what (apart from defender kills) can fix this specific issue. It is winning for one team without having to play.
Comments
It’s per BG, so you need 50 different defenders in each bg to max out the points.
Curios what (apart from defender kills) can fix this specific issue. It is winning for one team without having to play.