Battle ground idea
Ngoalong711
Member Posts: 314 ★★
i don't understand why people keep asking for fair match when we're all chasing for same reward. how about low and mid f2p paragon players? we have to face those whales account with a deck of almost full of r4s and so many new champions that we still not know how to fight them.
how can you call that's fair when cavalier can get to GC and paragons don't.
so here is my idea for battle ground
matchmaking system should still based on prestige and hero based but wider.
example :
in bronze - gold : 10k vs 15k prestige is ok.
in plat - diamond : 10k vs 13k prestige is ok
in GC : range is 2k prestige.
but one thing different is that we will not lose our medals. if we face a weaker account then we should win and go up. if we face a bigger account then we lose but not go down.
that will make everything fair. smaller account should not be at higher position than bigger account in theory right?
of course with good draff and skill you still able to beat a bigger account but a cavalier is higher than paragon is just stupid.
how can you call that's fair when cavalier can get to GC and paragons don't.
so here is my idea for battle ground
matchmaking system should still based on prestige and hero based but wider.
example :
in bronze - gold : 10k vs 15k prestige is ok.
in plat - diamond : 10k vs 13k prestige is ok
in GC : range is 2k prestige.
but one thing different is that we will not lose our medals. if we face a weaker account then we should win and go up. if we face a bigger account then we lose but not go down.
that will make everything fair. smaller account should not be at higher position than bigger account in theory right?
of course with good draff and skill you still able to beat a bigger account but a cavalier is higher than paragon is just stupid.
Post edited by Kabam Porthos on
1