Champions that should be tagged as Dimensional Beings

2»

Comments

  • KhanMedinaKhanMedina Member Posts: 927 ★★★
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    Dr_ARCHer wrote: »
    I don’t think there is any “formal” definition of a dimension. I may be wrong here, but in the comics, sometimes dimensions refer to alternate realities. If so, then any hero not from the Earth 616 ‘dimension’ would be considered as dimensional beings.

    There's no "formal" definition of "dimension" in Marvel comics, but we can take reasonable guesses as to what the phrase "dimensional being" means given the champs that were tagged as such.

    Its not like the phrase "dimensional being" is a thing that we can judge whether Kabam is using the term correctly. But we can see if the things they call dimensional beings appears to be self-consistent. But if anyone decides to check to see if Kabam is following their own personal preconceived notions of what a dimensional being is, they'll likely be disappointed.

    They are not consistent. Hood and GR count even though they are humans possessed by beings. UC, Juggs, and maybe even MK are also in that boat but do not count. If the hood counts just for the magical cloak, then why doesn't guillotine for her magical sword? It's a very arbitrary tag.
  • RotellyRotelly Member Posts: 774 ★★★
    Rotelly wrote: »
    @Kabam Miike can anyone provide insight into why champs are flagged as dimensional?

    @Kabam Miike can anyone provide insight into why champs are flagged as dimensional?
Sign In or Register to comment.