Worth skipping the 6* AG in this case?

Polygon

For this specific case if you had as many gems as below



Been skipping on sigs from the BGs shop since r4 mats became cheaper. We’ve had generics handed to us like candy, but the sigs still seem to be gatekeepen outside of BGs.

Got a Valk and Attuma I need to sig 200 and only at 135 sigs atm.




Valk is going to get one. Skipping kitty as I don’t like the playstyle and not as good with her , (same for tigra). Was considering Namor for a korg BGs counter but he’d be extremely niche for fights outside of that so probably going to pass on him too.

7 is plenty and not to mention all the class gems, plus by the time I get more champs that benefit from awakening , I’d just get more gems.

The only way I can see these 6* gems being of value to me is if by some miraculous announcement in the future next year we can trade multiple 6* gems for a 7* gem.

Also if you read this far, is it worth picking path C for the sigs or shards over the 300 6* relic shards in path D?

JT_Supreme

Yes, given how many gems you have, I’d do path C for shards or sigs

Since you have so many I’d give hulking and Rintrah one too and some sigs, since they are staples in bg. It only helps even a little.

Boombzy

I see about 5 champions that could use gems.

Given the fact you're just using shards to eventually awaken champions, why not just use the ones you got and get more awakening gems?

Rudolph_Raindeer

No, I’d still grab the AG

I got the ag and went from 15 to 16 generic AGs. Maybe a Trade in for a 7s AG will appear in the future 🤷🏼‍♂️

Polygon

Rudolph_Raindeer said:

I got the ag and went from 15 to 16 generic AGs. Maybe a Trade in for a 7s AG will appear in the future 🤷🏼‍♂️

This is the only reason why I didn’t just go for the sigs already and made the thread. Wanted to see if anyone else was thinking if this might ever happen