I hope you're happy with her, since it appears that you've already pulled the trigger on Awakening her and taking her to r4.
Another time, if you're asking for help from the forums, you might want to wait longer than just the first answer from a guy who doesn't understand that she inflicts Ruptures, not bleeds; and apparently doesn't even have her, himself.
She is mid. Or at least ranking her up doesn’t really make her better and scale her as it does normal champs. Her attacks inflict ruptures which are dependent on her armor rating, not attack. Since the vast majority of her damage comes from ruptures, ranking her up doesn’t really improve her damage a whole lot, only armor really provides her with a noticeable increase. All that said, she’s still not that impressive to me. She has easy access to heal block which is nice if you need it but I don’t think she even cracks top 10 tech IMO.
I always say rank who you want. However, if you ask for help on the forums I would highly suggest giving multiple people time to respond. The first guy doesn’t have her and obviously has no idea how her kit works.
She is good, her scaling is strange since her ruptured are based on her armor. So a 4 star version of her is very strong compared to other 4 star champs, while a 7 star version may not seem as strong.
But aside from the scaling I think she’s a great champ, requires an aggressive playstyle and avoiding blocking hits but she’s got some great utility, countering most mutants and I find her playstyle very fun.
I got a 6* from featured and read @Magrailothos thread and she does seem kind of underwhelming. In my personal opinion. If the scaling wasn't this strange. I guess I probably would maybe ranked her. Even then theres still better tech's out there
I hope you're happy with her, since it appears that you've already pulled the trigger on Awakening her and taking her to r4.
Another time, if you're asking for help from the forums, you might want to wait longer than just the first answer from a guy who doesn't understand that she inflicts Ruptures, not bleeds; and apparently doesn't even have her, himself.
Hopefully I'm just being over-cautious. Let us know how it works out for you.
So I have been opening a few FCs hoping to pull Silk and Lady D, and had no luck on either.
However based on what people in this thread and the other thread, would it is a right assumption to say the maybe a R5 x 5* Lady D max sig, maybe the best option and balance between all of the rarity?
The above chat is excellent at helping you decide. There is even a map showing how her damage scales with rank. It does look like 5r5 might actually be better..i have started opening 5* featured as well to get her there.
The above chat is excellent at helping you decide. There is even a map showing how her damage scales with rank. It does look like 5r5 might actually be better..i have started opening 5* featured as well to get her there.
I was the one who made that graph, the thing to keep in mind here is that the chart displays her base armour rating across all ranks/rarities. Her kit is a bit weird in the way it scales, while the 5* r5 does have higher base armour rating, it has lower ability armour rating when compared to the 6* r4. When you add it all up; base armour rating + armour up buff + 7 armour up passives, the total armour rating for the 6* r4 is higher. Slightly. By like ~86 armour rating.
So the 6* r4 is not inherently worse than the 5* r5. Adding in the adrenaline mechanic and extra base stats, the 6* is certainly worth ranking imo. If you have the resources to rank her beyond r3 and can give her sig stones, it will definitely be better than the 5*. However, if you won't take her higher than r3 and don't plan to invest sig stones, then the 5* is a great alternative.
The above chat is excellent at helping you decide. There is even a map showing how her damage scales with rank. It does look like 5r5 might actually be better..i have started opening 5* featured as well to get her there.
I was the one who made that graph, the thing to keep in mind here is that the chart displays her base armour rating across all ranks/rarities. Her kit is a bit weird in the way it scales, while the 5* r5 does have higher base armour rating, it has lower ability armour rating when compared to the 6* r4. When you add it all up; base armour rating + armour up buff + 7 armour up passives, the total armour rating for the 6* r4 is higher. Slightly. By like ~86 armour rating.
So the 6* r4 is not inherently worse than the 5* r5. Adding in the adrenaline mechanic and extra base stats, the 6* is certainly worth ranking imo. If you have the resources to rank her beyond r3 and can give her sig stones, it will definitely be better than the 5*. However, if you won't take her higher than r3 and don't plan to invest sig stones, then the 5* is a great alternative.
Thank you so much for creating a very helpful graph and also for the extra information.
I guess for me the 5* R5 might be the "best" option for me, as while you pointed out the the 6* would still have advantages overall, with my relative small account I would have a better chance of maxing the 5* version with sig, than taking the 6* to R4 and high sig, especially since my luck in the current FC 6* have been rubbish.
That might just be enough for me (I'm still drafting my 5* Warlock these day, so a 5* Lady D wouldn't be too bad).
Comments
Another time, if you're asking for help from the forums, you might want to wait longer than just the first answer from a guy who doesn't understand that she inflicts Ruptures, not bleeds; and apparently doesn't even have her, himself. Personally, I would have said that she looks good, but may not get as much better at r4 as you would have hoped, and pointed you towards this thread for more information: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/343699/lady-deathstrike-s-scaling-problem
Hopefully I'm just being over-cautious. Let us know how it works out for you.
But aside from the scaling I think she’s a great champ, requires an aggressive playstyle and avoiding blocking hits but she’s got some great utility, countering most mutants and I find her playstyle very fun.
However based on what people in this thread and the other thread, would it is a right assumption to say the maybe a R5 x 5* Lady D max sig, maybe the best option and balance between all of the rarity?
The above chat is excellent at helping you decide. There is even a map showing how her damage scales with rank. It does look like 5r5 might actually be better..i have started opening 5* featured as well to get her there.
So the 6* r4 is not inherently worse than the 5* r5. Adding in the adrenaline mechanic and extra base stats, the 6* is certainly worth ranking imo. If you have the resources to rank her beyond r3 and can give her sig stones, it will definitely be better than the 5*. However, if you won't take her higher than r3 and don't plan to invest sig stones, then the 5* is a great alternative.
Thank you so much for creating a very helpful graph and also for the extra information.
I guess for me the 5* R5 might be the "best" option for me, as while you pointed out the the 6* would still have advantages overall, with my relative small account I would have a better chance of maxing the 5* version with sig, than taking the 6* to R4 and high sig, especially since my luck in the current FC 6* have been rubbish.
That might just be enough for me (I'm still drafting my 5* Warlock these day, so a 5* Lady D wouldn't be too bad).
Many thanks for the very helpful info.