Northstar deep dive

EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
https://youtu.be/glFUy_atsYY?si=fT2o-w3gRFSoJbja

Thoughts?

Comments

  • JinxesaxeJinxesaxe Member Posts: 442 ★★★
    Could easily be my favorite champion of 2024 so far. I would love to know who designed him.

    Jinx
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
    ItsClobberinTime said:

    Ironically, he looks like he's going have the same issues as QS, good damage but slow af because of the combo animations. On top of that, he las less utility than QS, looks mid to me not excited about him at all, Arcade however different story.

    Plus it also says he’s meant for longer fights, does this mean he’s not good for BGs?
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,444 ★★★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    ItsClobberinTime said:

    Ironically, he looks like he's going have the same issues as QS, good damage but slow af because of the combo animations. On top of that, he las less utility than QS, looks mid to me not excited about him at all, Arcade however different story.

    Plus it also says he’s meant for longer fights, does this mean he’s not good for BGs?
    By the looks of it, yes no good for BGs
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
    ItsClobberinTime said:

    EdisonLaw said:

    ItsClobberinTime said:

    Ironically, he looks like he's going have the same issues as QS, good damage but slow af because of the combo animations. On top of that, he las less utility than QS, looks mid to me not excited about him at all, Arcade however different story.

    Plus it also says he’s meant for longer fights, does this mean he’s not good for BGs?
    By the looks of it, yes no good for BGs
    He might be a good defender
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,444 ★★★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    ItsClobberinTime said:

    EdisonLaw said:

    ItsClobberinTime said:

    Ironically, he looks like he's going have the same issues as QS, good damage but slow af because of the combo animations. On top of that, he las less utility than QS, looks mid to me not excited about him at all, Arcade however different story.

    Plus it also says he’s meant for longer fights, does this mean he’s not good for BGs?
    By the looks of it, yes no good for BGs
    He might be a good defender
    Ehhhh not really I don't see how anything in his kit could be problematic on defense
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 9,614 ★★★★★
    He applies slow, but bullseye is unaffected by slow, if he is duped, he can avoid crit hit from skill champs. A poor bullseye counter.

    He seems to be a good KM counter, but don't we have a million of em already?
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
    Priyabrata said:


    The hierarchy of power in the Contest is about to change
  • 13579rebel_13579rebel_ Member Posts: 2,791 ★★★★★
    Meh, Arcade looks better
  • KDoggg2017KDoggg2017 Member Posts: 1,243 ★★★★
    Might be my type of champ if he had more utility. But my R3 Quicksilver does everything he doesn't.
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
    edited June 3
    captain_rogers said:

    He applies slow, but bullseye is unaffected by slow, if he is duped, he can avoid crit hit from skill champs. A poor bullseye counter.

    He seems to be a good KM counter, but don't we have a million of em already?

    I don’t think the slow is supposed to be for Bullseye. It’s meant to counter Killmonger and Korg. It can also counter other unstoppable and evade champs as well as champs weak to Slow such as Doom. The only champs this doesn’t counter are tech champs (which are few). It’s very useful
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 7,659 ★★★★★
    Also he seems to be a pure attacker
Sign In or Register to comment.