April champions revealed: Lumatrix and Spider Woman

EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★
https://x.com/MarvelChampions/status/1906831564115226684

Both look interesting. Hopefully Spider woman will be the true hard Enchantress counter unlike Joaquin Torres (Falcon). Lumatrix looks a lot better than Isophyne already.

Comments

  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★

    This is a spider character that can actually do something different than a nomal spider-man, so complaints about her being added will be dumb.

    Yeah it looks like she brings back Leader's Severe Debuffs, plus her damage seems to be based on Power Stings.
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 9,329 ★★★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    https://x.com/MarvelChampions/status/1906831564115226684

    Both look interesting. Hopefully Spider woman will be the true hard Enchantress counter unlike Joaquin Torres (Falcon). Lumatrix looks a lot better than Isophyne already.

    Looks like she has more stackable debilitate i just wish we knew the 2 other effects she has the one passive and the other is hard to make out but she looks so good wonder if she will have any defensive utility or dodge utility
  • 713_o_f1673r713_o_f1673r Member Posts: 704 ★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    This is a spider character that can actually do something different than a nomal spider-man, so complaints about her being added will be dumb.

    Yeah it looks like she brings back Leader's Severe Debuffs, plus her damage seems to be based on Power Stings.
    Makes sense because venom blasts.

  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★

    joaquin gettin the leader/nefaria treatment with spiderwoman bro


  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★
    Bendy said:

    EdisonLaw said:

    https://x.com/MarvelChampions/status/1906831564115226684

    Both look interesting. Hopefully Spider woman will be the true hard Enchantress counter unlike Joaquin Torres (Falcon). Lumatrix looks a lot better than Isophyne already.

    Looks like she has more stackable debilitate i just wish we knew the 2 other effects she has the one passive and the other is hard to make out but she looks so good wonder if she will have any defensive utility or dodge utility
    It looks like she has the panic debuff, same as Deathless Thanos
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 9,329 ★★★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    Bendy said:

    EdisonLaw said:

    https://x.com/MarvelChampions/status/1906831564115226684

    Both look interesting. Hopefully Spider woman will be the true hard Enchantress counter unlike Joaquin Torres (Falcon). Lumatrix looks a lot better than Isophyne already.

    Looks like she has more stackable debilitate i just wish we knew the 2 other effects she has the one passive and the other is hard to make out but she looks so good wonder if she will have any defensive utility or dodge utility
    It looks like she has the panic debuff, same as Deathless Thanos
    I thought it but it looks different to what the glossary is
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★

    Yes folks, OP is correct, Lumatrix is way better than Isophyne.
    Please don't rank up your Isophynes, especially if she's awakened.
    And please don't put Isophyne in your BG deck, and especially don't use her against Serpent.
    Not that anyone uses Serpent as a defender, but just in case someone does....

    Let’s see if she gets rebalanced
  • Toyota_2015Toyota_2015 Member Posts: 969 ★★★★

    This is a spider character that can actually do something different than a nomal spider-man, so complaints about her being added will be dumb.

    The complaints will be extra invalid considering that she has absolutely nothing to do with Spider-Man other than the fact she has “Spider” in her name.
  • Toyota_2015Toyota_2015 Member Posts: 969 ★★★★
    I like how Lumatrix is continuing the tradition of “characters whose special 2 consists of them spinning very fast,” joining the ranks of Black Bolt and Iron Patriot.
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 7,750 ★★★★★

    I like how Lumatrix is continuing the tradition of “characters whose special 2 consists of them spinning very fast,” joining the ranks of Black Bolt and Iron Patriot.

    But with swords
  • TotemCorruptionTotemCorruption Member Posts: 2,568 ★★★★★
    Buttehrs said:

    I like how Lumatrix is continuing the tradition of “characters whose special 2 consists of them spinning very fast,” joining the ranks of Black Bolt and Iron Patriot.

    But with swords
    So basically Blade's heavy attack?
  • ViperOfChampionViperOfChampion Member Posts: 915 ★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    Yes folks, OP is correct, Lumatrix is way better than Isophyne.
    Please don't rank up your Isophynes, especially if she's awakened.
    And please don't put Isophyne in your BG deck, and especially don't use her against Serpent.
    Not that anyone uses Serpent as a defender, but just in case someone does....

    Let’s see if she gets rebalanced
    there is no shot they rebalance a free champ to be better than their advertising scummy champs. but if they did, they will increase her crit rate, or add a crit buff like wigra

  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 7,750 ★★★★★

    Buttehrs said:

    I like how Lumatrix is continuing the tradition of “characters whose special 2 consists of them spinning very fast,” joining the ranks of Black Bolt and Iron Patriot.

    But with swords
    So basically Blade's heavy attack?
    Basically
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★
    Buttehrs said:

    I like how Lumatrix is continuing the tradition of “characters whose special 2 consists of them spinning very fast,” joining the ranks of Black Bolt and Iron Patriot.

    But with swords
    I don't notice the swords though, but makes sense
  • Champion2020Champion2020 Member Posts: 6
    lumatrix's sp.2 is off for an assasin.
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 10,514 ★★★★★

    lumatrix's sp.2 is off for an assasin.

    It's a spinning move, fast and deadly
Sign In or Register to comment.