Options
Getting sick of new champions just being Defender or Counter to Defender

After seeing the previews of Maker and High Evolutionary, we get Onslaught counter #2 and Tough-Defender-Science-Edition.
And that comes on the heels of:
June (Arnim Zola counter #1 and Tough-Defender-Mystic-Edition)
May (Tough-Defender-Skill-Edition)
April (Enchantress counter #2)
March (Onslaught counter #1 and pre-Yelena counter #1)
Feb (Enchantress counter #1 and Bullseye counter #2)
Jan (Tough-Defender-Tech-Edition and Bullseye counter #1).
Yes, I am being reductive, but it does seem like there is a specific design philosophy for 2025 champions where there is a direct causal link to why a champion has a specific ability.
Even 2024 champions already showed somewhat of a pivot to this type of design philosophy.
Looking at the list of 2023 champions makes me nostalgic now for the previous era where there didn't seem to be a direct causal link to why a champion's kit is the way it is.
I want to emphasize that there isn't anything wrong with Kabam deciding to design champions this way. The argument of "well if they can handle (insert champion name like Serpent), that means they should be useful in a ton of ways" is true, as Spiderwoman being an Enchantress counter doesn't take away from how amazing she is overall. I just want to say that that this type of champion design to fit a specific formula is not really my cup of tea, and will likely decrease my interest in the game as it continues.
And that comes on the heels of:
June (Arnim Zola counter #1 and Tough-Defender-Mystic-Edition)
May (Tough-Defender-Skill-Edition)
April (Enchantress counter #2)
March (Onslaught counter #1 and pre-Yelena counter #1)
Feb (Enchantress counter #1 and Bullseye counter #2)
Jan (Tough-Defender-Tech-Edition and Bullseye counter #1).
Yes, I am being reductive, but it does seem like there is a specific design philosophy for 2025 champions where there is a direct causal link to why a champion has a specific ability.
Even 2024 champions already showed somewhat of a pivot to this type of design philosophy.
Looking at the list of 2023 champions makes me nostalgic now for the previous era where there didn't seem to be a direct causal link to why a champion's kit is the way it is.
I want to emphasize that there isn't anything wrong with Kabam deciding to design champions this way. The argument of "well if they can handle (insert champion name like Serpent), that means they should be useful in a ton of ways" is true, as Spiderwoman being an Enchantress counter doesn't take away from how amazing she is overall. I just want to say that that this type of champion design to fit a specific formula is not really my cup of tea, and will likely decrease my interest in the game as it continues.
49
Comments
For example, when Iceman was first released as a defender, there were very few counters, till later on. Same with Iron Man Infinity War, Peni Parker, Terrax, Gorr, especially Serpent, it's always like this
In the case of Spiral her dodge doesn't even work against science class btw so she can't dodge Photon in pure light form, that ability is obviously designed just for Serpent and nobody else. There are about 4-5 meta defenders she works "well" for, she can't even take most of the others cause her utility is so niche and gameplay loop is too strict. Her fervors are so hard to keep up unless the opponent has power gain, even without nodes its often a struggle. If Serpent didn't exist in the game nobody would use Spiral at all and you all know it, but because he does everyone has her in their deck which goes to show how ridiculous this design philosophy has become.
I'm all for generalists like Dazzler and Shathra but champions who are designed just around a single defender in the whole game disgust me. There's a major problem with champion design since 2024 starting with Bullseye, wonder what caused it after one of if not the most succesful year of champion release. Just tragic.
Negasonic evade can be used against kate bishop, mordo, bullseye and wasp. It’s not as if bullseye is the only champ with that. Her utility has a lot of versatility with the fact she places only passives. This makes her viable for a lot of the skill class as well as nodes where debuffs are denied. I don’t know why people keep lumping her as a character built to counter a specific champ, she counters a specific gameplay in game entirely.
Also for spiral, just because one mechanic isn’t relevant to other champs, doesn’t mean her entire is useless.
Even the way champions are buffed reflect this purposeful choice - 2023 Cap Britain is repurposed to be a 2025 defender. 2016 Cyclops is repurposed to be a 2025 Bullseye counter. Phoenix becomes an Arnim counter. Etc.
While there is merit to giving ignored/undervalued champions a purpose, this type of focus on BG designing champions is not my cup of tea.
If they aren't battlegrounds oriented then yall simply wouldn't want them as much or place them as highly as the BG champions.
Theres also Carolina for Zola, and Nico for Serpent and Dark Phoenix. And skill defenders like korg, KM, attuma are rarely used as much in decks
Maker is outright immune to neuroshock and. Abunch of other abilities that directly counter onslaught and cap britain, fine, but what else he has in his kit? Some tough complex playstyle. This kind of design will create a annoying loop over time.
Leader NEFARIA
Torres. SPIDER WOMAN
Thankfully everybody respects Jack but it’s almost like he was used to promote bastion
This is becoming a serious problem that will never stop unless champs are designed to differ from others
And as leader didn’t get an upgrade I’m not sure Torres will, which is a shame because I think that he’s so cool