Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
Dorky Dave used to run a r3 Mags with Iceman and Wolverine in aq for the crit synergies. He's since r4d or r5d him. Should we also nerf Iceman and wolverine?
AQ.
So?
Where is this entitlement coming from? AQ is just as important for progression as AW for many.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
Dorky Dave used to run a r3 Mags with Iceman and Wolverine in aq for the crit synergies. He's since r4d or r5d him. Should we also nerf Iceman and wolverine?
AQ.
So?
Where is this entitlement coming from? AQ is just as important for progression as AW for many.
I can do aq with my eyes closed.
Can also run any path with all the regen champs put there.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Why the people are giving horrible ideas for kabam?they had enough already.if they will ever nerf blade,or his synergy team,that will be the biggest outrage ever from the players and a financial disaster for them.they will sell the best 5* heroes for 10$,to survive and to pay the bills.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
Dorky Dave used to run a r3 Mags with Iceman and Wolverine in aq for the crit synergies. He's since r4d or r5d him. Should we also nerf Iceman and wolverine?
AQ.
So?
Where is this entitlement coming from? AQ is just as important for progression as AW for many.
Sophistry, can you argue without the fallacy? This strawman is hardly worth the time but there are people who do not recognize it for what it is so let me explain it to you, i cannot however ubderstand it for you.
AQ is significantly easier than AW and DDD was bringing that team to map 5 with his 4/55 Bobby and 5/50 Wolverine, those two champs were more than enough to take on AQ at the level he was playing at, his third champion was not even needed.
It was put best earlier, AQ.
*Map5 is also regularly done with r3 champs however tier1 AW is never done with 3*
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
Dorky Dave used to run a r3 Mags with Iceman and Wolverine in aq for the crit synergies. He's since r4d or r5d him. Should we also nerf Iceman and wolverine?
AQ.
So?
Where is this entitlement coming from? AQ is just as important for progression as AW for many.
I can do aq with my eyes closed.
Can also run any path with all the regen champs put there.
Congrats. You’re so good.
Point still stands. AQ is no less important than AW for progression.
You’re not entitled to anything bc you want easy 5* shards.
Im not saying he needs to be nerfed but when someone sacrifices a champ in aw just for his synergies it’s saying something.
-Top 100 aw
I’m not saying he must’ve picked a path that had 7 danger sense defenders in a row.. actually I’m saying that’s exactly what happened.
The joys of being able to see defenders.
Whether or not there were 7 danger sense defenders in a row, doing aw with 2 champs and using 1 soley for synergy tells me a lot about the champ.
If 1 synergy is this strong to replace an atker, to me it’s saying something.
Name one other champ that you would switch out an atker for synergy.
Tells you something about the synergy.
Tells you something about the fact that alliances refuse to place diverse defenses and strategically separate danger sense champs instead of lining them up in a row.
Tells you something about the fact that you will continue to lose if you don’t adapt.
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Aka... i have nothing.
Keep crying.
Hope we end up in AW soon.
Same. See you in game 🙂
Yea. Looking forward to the buffet of danger sense champs.
I don’t have time to read all of this, but I will say this: kabam heard for a year about mystic dispersion and defenses. They created “defender diverisdy” which was totally dumb. So they ditche that and created a champ that could destroy magik in all situations (not just magiks that arch angel could get through) and in the process deal with the other problematic mystics—dorm, mephisto and then villains with gr synergy.
The response from kabam should not be to nerf blade. The next thing that will happen will be to create defenders (heroes) that blade can’t walk through. He is nowhere near as op as scarlet witch and thor were.
LOL love seeing these blade debates
1. Blade needs his synergy
2. Place more diverse defences
3. They arent going to nerf him so continue your crying and outbursts
4. Soon enough, these nerf blade post would turn into the annoying and mostly ignored rank down ticket posts and be tossed into forum trashcan history
Comments
Not complaining about war as we win most of our wars but I am talking about how insane his synergy is that it warrants an attacker.
Again, i dont want him nerfed as I am going for him when he comes back.
What other champs would you place in war? Hmm maybe cyclops over mystic defenders. As of the moment right now, whoever has more blades will most likely have less deaths in AW.
You keep throwing out these diverse defenses but what champs are there? Who do you place? There are a select number of defenders that actually get kills in t1, most do not.
So?
Where is this entitlement coming from? AQ is just as important for progression as AW for many.
I can do aq with my eyes closed.
Can also run any path with all the regen champs put there.
Yea I’m not helping people outside my alliance set their defense.
There are champs that blade can’t get danger sense against that are viable on tier 1. People are not placing them on the strongest nodes. People are placing too many danger sense champs lined up in a row instead of scattering them. The fact that you can see every defender is making it worse.
And when defenders go back to being hidden, the whining will change from nerf blade to AW is too hard.
Aka... i have nothing.
Keep crying.
Hope we end up in AW soon.
Same. See you in game 🙂
AQ is significantly easier than AW and DDD was bringing that team to map 5 with his 4/55 Bobby and 5/50 Wolverine, those two champs were more than enough to take on AQ at the level he was playing at, his third champion was not even needed.
It was put best earlier, AQ.
*Map5 is also regularly done with r3 champs however tier1 AW is never done with 3*
Congrats. You’re so good.
Point still stands. AQ is no less important than AW for progression.
You’re not entitled to anything bc you want easy 5* shards.
Yea. Looking forward to the buffet of danger sense champs.
The response from kabam should not be to nerf blade. The next thing that will happen will be to create defenders (heroes) that blade can’t walk through. He is nowhere near as op as scarlet witch and thor were.
1. Blade needs his synergy
2. Place more diverse defences
3. They arent going to nerf him so continue your crying and outbursts
4. Soon enough, these nerf blade post would turn into the annoying and mostly ignored rank down ticket posts and be tossed into forum trashcan history