MattScott wrote: » Calling out by name a specific ally/person is against TOS. Just so you know for future posts.
MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck.
BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though
MattScott wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though I’m trying to help you not get flagged. As i have gotten points for exactly this. The level of their players does not equal a mismatch. Their war rating is low, so they probably aren’t skilled, or don’t care much for war. Growing sick of these “war mismatch” threads when they are within 50 points of each other.
_ASDF_ wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though I’m trying to help you not get flagged. As i have gotten points for exactly this. The level of their players does not equal a mismatch. Their war rating is low, so they probably aren’t skilled, or don’t care much for war. Growing sick of these “war mismatch” threads when they are within 50 points of each other. Sounds good!! I do not care to have anymore of your input It’s not a mismatch. It’s how the matchmaking works. It’s based on wins/losses. If it was only based on ally ranking you’d move up slowly over a year. If you don’t like it, focus on AQ.
BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though I’m trying to help you not get flagged. As i have gotten points for exactly this. The level of their players does not equal a mismatch. Their war rating is low, so they probably aren’t skilled, or don’t care much for war. Growing sick of these “war mismatch” threads when they are within 50 points of each other. Sounds good!! I do not care to have anymore of your input
_ASDF_ wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » _ASDF_ wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though I’m trying to help you not get flagged. As i have gotten points for exactly this. The level of their players does not equal a mismatch. Their war rating is low, so they probably aren’t skilled, or don’t care much for war. Growing sick of these “war mismatch” threads when they are within 50 points of each other. Sounds good!! I do not care to have anymore of your input It’s not a mismatch. It’s how the matchmaking works. It’s based on wins/losses. If it was only based on ally ranking you’d move up slowly over a year. If you don’t like it, focus on AQ. Doesn't seem very constructive This thread isn’t constructive. You don’t understand the matchmaking logic and therefore think it’s unfair. If it was purely on alliance rating it would take years to get into the tiers that offer 5* shards. Our ally is 8.5 mill. We get slaughtered when facing 10.5-11mill alliances because their defenders are all R4 5*s. But we win more than we lose and get decent rewards. Stop acting like a child.
BigerRedBD wrote: » _ASDF_ wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » BigerRedBD wrote: » MattScott wrote: » I did. And i know how the forum works. This is not “calling them out” i agree. But to mention/show them by name, will count as such. And it’s not a mismatch. Similar war rating. Good luck. This is a mismatch, we only have 2 players in our alliance that are level 60, the other alliance players(30) are all level 60, that's a mismatch. Nothing in the rules saying as "such". Thanks for the luck though I’m trying to help you not get flagged. As i have gotten points for exactly this. The level of their players does not equal a mismatch. Their war rating is low, so they probably aren’t skilled, or don’t care much for war. Growing sick of these “war mismatch” threads when they are within 50 points of each other. Sounds good!! I do not care to have anymore of your input It’s not a mismatch. It’s how the matchmaking works. It’s based on wins/losses. If it was only based on ally ranking you’d move up slowly over a year. If you don’t like it, focus on AQ. Doesn't seem very constructive