AW matching

Trevererik1_Trevererik1_ Member Posts: 45 ★
in Suggestions and Requests
My alliance is 2 mil and it matched us with a 4 mil alliance. We have 22 n they have 30. Alot of higher alliances are doing this so they can move up in tiers. Isn't there something you can do to fix it.

Comments

  • ImmortalImmortal Member Posts: 323 ★★
    There's an option to change the 3 bg to 2. A lot of alliances participate in smaller bgs since not every one wants to do war.
  • KromestoneKromestone Member Posts: 81
    Once my alliance of 4mil was matched against a 8.3mil alliance and we got our ass handed to us.... I think aw matching shouldn't be based on war rating but on total alliance power.. That will be a more fairer means of matching...
  • CrackhorseCrackhorse Member Posts: 64 ★
    Kromestone wrote: »
    Once my alliance of 4mil was matched against a 8.3mil alliance and we got our ass handed to us.... I think aw matching shouldn't be based on war rating but on total alliance power.. That will be a more fairer means of matching...

    This is how war match making was setup when they originally came out. Skill and strategy were the determining factor in who won each time because similar prestige alliances would have off each war.

    But the people who spend loads of money cried because they weren't getting the best rewards so kabam changed to the current system. The wealthy player base pushed to make the game worse due to their on greed. It's a game simulating reality and I don't think they're changing it back.
  • Ja55Ja55 Member Posts: 155 ★
    Crackhorse wrote: »
    Kromestone wrote: »
    Once my alliance of 4mil was matched against a 8.3mil alliance and we got our ass handed to us.... I think aw matching shouldn't be based on war rating but on total alliance power.. That will be a more fairer means of matching...

    This is how war match making was setup when they originally came out. Skill and strategy were the determining factor in who won each time because similar prestige alliances would have off each war.

    But the people who spend loads of money cried because they weren't getting the best rewards so kabam changed to the current system. The wealthy player base pushed to make the game worse due to their on greed. It's a game simulating reality and I don't think they're changing it back.

    That is not what happened. Originally you were matched on alliance size or overall rating. People were selling their 2* and 3*s to get beter match ups. The current system is much better.
  • CrackhorseCrackhorse Member Posts: 64 ★
    Ja55 wrote: »
    Crackhorse wrote: »
    Kromestone wrote: »
    Once my alliance of 4mil was matched against a 8.3mil alliance and we got our ass handed to us.... I think aw matching shouldn't be based on war rating but on total alliance power.. That will be a more fairer means of matching...

    This is how war match making was setup when they originally came out. Skill and strategy were the determining factor in who won each time because similar prestige alliances would have off each war.

    But the people who spend loads of money cried because they weren't getting the best rewards so kabam changed to the current system. The wealthy player base pushed to make the game worse due to their on greed. It's a game simulating reality and I don't think they're changing it back.

    That is not what happened. Originally you were matched on alliance size or overall rating. People were selling their 2* and 3*s to get beter match ups. The current system is much better.

    The current system is good for profitability and helping those with the best champs get better champs. Also much better queue times.

    I had thought the same as you but was told that it was based on prestige and not alliance rating. Regardless, if they simply base it on prestige then there wouldn't be an issue. (Would be interesting to see alliances struggle with level up top preside champs it not, but don't this would be a major factor)
  • Ja55Ja55 Member Posts: 155 ★
    Crackhorse wrote: »
    Ja55 wrote: »
    Crackhorse wrote: »
    Kromestone wrote: »
    Once my alliance of 4mil was matched against a 8.3mil alliance and we got our ass handed to us.... I think aw matching shouldn't be based on war rating but on total alliance power.. That will be a more fairer means of matching...

    This is how war match making was setup when they originally came out. Skill and strategy were the determining factor in who won each time because similar prestige alliances would have off each war.

    But the people who spend loads of money cried because they weren't getting the best rewards so kabam changed to the current system. The wealthy player base pushed to make the game worse due to their on greed. It's a game simulating reality and I don't think they're changing it back.

    That is not what happened. Originally you were matched on alliance size or overall rating. People were selling their 2* and 3*s to get beter match ups. The current system is much better.

    The current system is good for profitability and helping those with the best champs get better champs. Also much better queue times.

    I had thought the same as you but was told that it was based on prestige and not alliance rating. Regardless, if they simply base it on prestige then there wouldn't be an issue. (Would be interesting to see alliances struggle with level up top preside champs it not, but don't this would be a major factor)

    Was told by who? That is how the preseason was set up.
Sign In or Register to comment.