Blade or archangel vs LOL magik

Gubm1

hey guys, so , on sunday i'm going to make my first run in the LOL ( easy path).
I'm going to take Stark spidey r4 as my main hero .
My doubt is : Blade or archangel ( both 4*) , who is better against magik and who would be most useful to help in other fights?
I'm inclined to take Blade because of the synergy with spidey .
Any thougths ?

Thanks and Sorry about my english .

Sungj

Blade will be better in my opinion, archangel since he can't parry heavy in LOL he won't be as consistent

beyonder8421

Sungj wrote: »

Blade will be better in my opinion, archangel since he can't parry heavy in LOL he won't be as consistent

What's wrong with Archangel's parry in LoL?

CloserByTomorrow

The nodes have limber.

Dude just boost and use stark. Parry before you attack with pacify to stop limbo and you’ll down her in 2-3 revives

CloserByTomorrow

Sungj wrote: »

Blade will be better in my opinion, archangel since he can't parry heavy in LOL he won't be as consistent

I soloed magik w r4 aa when I did path 7. You don’t need parry to land heavies bro. You can counter her heavy and both specials with heavy attacks

taojay1

I literally just did my first run with unduped stark. I knew magik was bad but it wasn't as horrible as I thought it would be. With stark and maxed pacify you can greatly reduce the effects of limbo. My strategy was to build up poise at the beginning, then hit her block a couple times to give her a little power. Then I do a 5 hit combo, which should put her right before a bar of power and also place taunt. Then just parry and push her over. Most of the time limbo didn't trigger, and when it did it was reduced damage because of taunt. Stark is also great because with miles synergy his parry won't be affected by limber.

Gubm1

Okay, thanks for the help guys.