Options
Battlegroup Assignments
Thewrightdale
Posts: 12 ★
Hey Guys. I have a suggestion to make it easier for Alliance leaders to coordinate battlegroups for AQ and AW.
Would it be possible to add a way to “tag” members with permissions to join either BG1, BG2, BG3, None
In addition you would have Officers be able to join all groups.
This would help with being able to coordinate attacks better for AQ and AW. Because you could avoid weak members joining the ring battlegroups and wouldn’t be forced to kick out players who either don’t communicate for whatever reason or “can’t” communicate due to language barriers.
This would be extremely helpful for Alliance leaders and take a lot of stress out of the communicating of battlegroup assignments all the time.
Most of the top alliances are assigning battlegroups in one form or another - whether through in game chat - or via other external apps like Line, what’s ap, etc.
Why not make this easier by simply adding a way to assign battlegroups to individual alliance members.
Would it be possible to add a way to “tag” members with permissions to join either BG1, BG2, BG3, None
In addition you would have Officers be able to join all groups.
This would help with being able to coordinate attacks better for AQ and AW. Because you could avoid weak members joining the ring battlegroups and wouldn’t be forced to kick out players who either don’t communicate for whatever reason or “can’t” communicate due to language barriers.
This would be extremely helpful for Alliance leaders and take a lot of stress out of the communicating of battlegroup assignments all the time.
Most of the top alliances are assigning battlegroups in one form or another - whether through in game chat - or via other external apps like Line, what’s ap, etc.
Why not make this easier by simply adding a way to assign battlegroups to individual alliance members.
0
