AW opponent selection

Hello i would like to ask how aw opponent is generated? Why is not the main key ali rating?
What to make it more competative and use just this. I just created new ali and we get 4times 3xstronger ali under ali rating and once 5x. I dont think that is interesting for both sides. Its absolutely demotivating for both sides. No one couldnt have pleasure from war like this and its bored for all and by my opinion its not too much fairplay.
Im not complaining, im just interesting hiw does it works and i am suggesting to use ali rating for better competetative war.
Thanks for your answer.
«1

Comments

  • AppleisgodAppleisgod Member Posts: 1,420 ★★★★
    It's based on war rating because otherwise any alliance could go to the top in war rating and tier
  • SuperFarzSuperFarz Member Posts: 166
    I can sell all my 1/2/3* perhaps even most 4* to lower the rating and destroy you even more! Serious note, not good idea. War rating is more balanced. After X wars you deserve the rating you are in and face people that are in the same range. Good luck in next wars
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    edited June 2018
    it is war rating and alliance rating
    you will find a matchup the is very close in both war rating and ally rating.....
    only time you will find a matchup outside of this is when none is available.....

    a 8.5mill ally with rating of 1000 will be matched against opponents with war rating of 1000 and ally rating between 8-10mil.
    a 4mil ally with a rating of 1600 will be matched against opponents with war rating of 1600 and ally rating between 3-6mil.

    when you are very low there are not always allies that come close in both to chose from as most allies dont stay down low for long.... those that are there are not looking for wars often......
    when you get up high you often get some mismatched matchups cus there is a smaller pool and less allies to cheose from and tougher comptition....

    but for the majority of allies in tier 12 to tier 4 most of your matchups will be close on both accounts
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    i have many screenshots from many different rating allies at many different tiers that will show this is the case.....
  • ContestOfNoobsContestOfNoobs Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★★
    @Maat1985

    total alliance power means nothing, only war rating.

    example.

    we faced mmxiv and my alliance at the time only had 18mil total and they have almost 32mil total.

    we are both tier 1 and 3000+ rating.
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    edited June 2018
    @ContestOfNoobs you are wrong dude
    i have posted about this soooo many times.....

    as i said dude it is different in the very top tiers as the pools are small and only the top allies are there

    i guess i will have to go through and post all my screenshots again.....
    it uses both. you are just seeing in tunnel visioned from the very top....

    where the majority of the player base are in tier 12-5 it will 95% of the time get you a matchup that is close in war rating and ally rating......

    just as up the top teams have been matched with different war ratings., this does not happen in the middle of the pack where most players are
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    my ally has been 8.5 mil rating all season and has a lowly war rating of 1000...
    we do 3 wars per week and our lowest rated opponent has been 7.5 mil and our highest has been 9.8mil.

    my other ally has been 4-4.5 mil rating all season and a slightly better but lowly rating of 1250....
    we also do 3 wars per week and our lowest rated opponent has been 3.7mil and our highest 5.6 mil.....
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    My exps is different. We almost always lost against ali with higher ali rating and almost always won against stronger. And another thing. What war rating we are talking about..ive just created new ali, so we should have 0 war rating...??? So i still dont understand how we with ali rating 1,2mil could get alis with 4times more than 3mil, we lost all and after that we much more stronger, ali with ali rating over 5mil.
    So from 5times we get ali 3times or 5times stronger. So i still dont think that this is ok and still dint understand why and how?
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    karci79 wrote: »
    My exps is different. We almost always lost against ali with higher ali rating and almost always won against stronger. And another thing. What war rating we are talking about..ive just created new ali, so we should have 0 war rating...??? So i still dont understand how we with ali rating 1,2mil could get alis with 4times more than 3mil, we lost all and after that we much more stronger, ali with ali rating over 5mil.
    So from 5times we get ali 3times or 5times stronger. So i still dont think that this is ok and still dint understand why and how?

    because there is bugger all allies also with 0 war rating to matchup with........

    once you climb a bit it will change.....
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    Another thing how the war is rating is counting??? Weve just started, we finished just 5 wars almost all lost and we have around 130. Even we lost with ali with war rating 70 we still have it higher than them??? And the last war we get ali with more than 300 war rating. Is it really strange only for me???
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    it is normal when you are really really low.....
    all wars will give a boost when you are really really low to stop allies being stuck on ).....
    also most allies with bugger all war rating are not looking for wars so it will matchup with all kinds of different allies. you will get some matchups against almost empty battlefields.... just keep going and it will change as you get higer war rating.....
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    I really like to see algorytm how they count it and generate opponents....
    We won, we get war rating, but how they get it... then we lost with ali with war rating 70, then we get ali with war rating 130 and we lost and then we get ali with war rarting 350.... :) ..... i dont get it.....
  • AppleisgodAppleisgod Member Posts: 1,420 ★★★★
    @Maat1985

    total alliance power means nothing, only war rating.

    example.

    we faced mmxiv and my alliance at the time only had 18mil total and they have almost 32mil total.

    we are both tier 1 and 3000+ rating.

    You are 100% correct, only war rating matters, alliance rating is nothing
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    You are saying that total ali power means nothing... i disagree. Its like to say the footbal club with the higher money for season means nothing. Of course time to time smaller club win against the bigger but in 99% the bigger one beat that smaller one. So thats why we have something like leagues....;)
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    not true.... not true at all.....
    of course when you look at all of tier 1,2,3 allies they are all high and only a small amount there so you matchup against whoever else is looking but not too many options.

    not only do i have alot of evidence to backup what i have said.

    can you explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil???? and i mean never above 7.5 mill opponent...... there woiuld be plenty of allies there that are 15mil but a 4mil ally there will never face them......
    explain how this happens if ally rating is not also considered.....
    we have asked @Kabam Miike to inform us how war matchups are found but they like to keep too keep too many secrets to stop people exploiting the system......
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    when you are in tier 1 it will do the best it can to match you up against a similar rating opponent but if mmxiv is looking at the same time only lower rated tier 1 allies are then they will have to be matched against a lower rated ally.....

    this does not happen in the thick of things in tier 12-5 as there will always be allies of all kinds of strengths looking due to the sheer volume of allies here so imbalanced matchups would be hard to come by.....

    it will almost never match you up with imbalanced war rating....
    it will only match you up with imbalanced ally rating when there is no close rating looking at the same time....
    it would happen more frequently at the top and bottom of the spectrum and almost never in the middle.....

    i can guaruntee you if i dropped my ally rating to 6 mil my matchups would become between 5.5 and 7.5 mil cus that is how we ran through half of season 1 and this was with 1100 war rating....
  • ContestOfNoobsContestOfNoobs Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★★
    edited June 2018
    u do know our 18m is nothing compared to an allaince thats almost 32m right?

    thats nearly a +10m difference

    and these guys rosters and huge and they have 2x r5 5*'s and finished "masters"
    not alot of allainces have a full team of 2x r5 5*'s and they are still going against mmxiv


    "can you explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil???? and i mean never above 7.5 mill opponent...... there woiuld be plenty of allies there that are 15mil but a 4mil ally there will never face them......"

    here is another examplle omni in TIER 4 war with

    OMNI 1991 rating
    CHULAZO 1910 rating

    perfect war rating to be matched up, both in tier 4.... but wait u said and i quote

    "explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil????"

    go to 0.:23 of the video and 0:31

    tier 4 war
    OMNI with 14 million rating average member rating is 502k
    CHULAZO 8milion rating average member rating is 277k

    BOTH in tier 4 war


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BogFez9isJY


    if i was to make my curent allaince who has a 3,000+ war rating and have 18m as an allaince and we decided to all "create" from scratch a new completely new alliance. we would start with 0 WAR rating and still have an 18m total as an alliance

    THERE wouild be "0" % chance we would face mmxiv because our war rating is 0 and not 3,000 and in tier 1.

    explain that.
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    Sorry but i still dont get it. Maybe because of my week english...however i see that nobody knows the algorytm how because its kabam's secret...
    We are at tier 1 and we can get in war alli with 200% war rating and 400% alli rating.
    And why is different on higher tiers is not clear to me also.
    Can you imagine how it was riddiculous if they see our 5k deffenders againt trheir more than 10k?!
    So its obvious that im asking why its like this and why it can not be more balanced in every tier...
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    edited June 2018
    u do know our 18m is nothing compared to an allaince thats almost 32m right?

    thats nearly a +10m difference

    and these guys rosters and huge and they have 2x r5 5*'s and finished "masters"
    not alot of allainces have a full team of 2x r5 5*'s and they are still going against mmxiv


    "can you explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil???? and i mean never above 7.5 mill opponent...... there woiuld be plenty of allies there that are 15mil but a 4mil ally there will never face them......"

    here is another examplle omni in TIER 4 war with

    OMNI 1991 rating
    CHULAZO 1910 rating

    perfect war rating to be matched up, both in tier 4.... but wait u said and i quote

    "explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil????"

    go to 0.:23 of the video and 0:31

    tier 4 war
    OMNI with 14 million rating average member rating is 502k
    CHULAZO 8milion rating average member rating is 277k

    BOTH in tier 4 war


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BogFez9isJY


    if i was to make my curent allaince who has a 3,000+ war rating and have 18m as an allaince and we decided to all "create" from scratch a new completely new alliance. we would start with 0 WAR rating and still have an 18m total as an alliance

    THERE wouild be "0" % chance we would face mmxiv because our war rating is 0 and not 3,000 and in tier 1.

    explain that.

    i said war rating is the biggest thing....

    i also said ally rating is afactor.........

    i said you will not face someone with a different war rating....

    i said you will where possible face someone who also has same ally rating. but when not possible you will face stronger/weaker.
    but it will look for a close match on both factors first.....

    start a new ally with a rating of 18mil
    once you get to around 1000 war rating take note of all you matchups.... 95% of them would fall with 2 million either side of you......


    you have given me a couple of examples of outliers and also i said top tier like 1-3 is different....
    there will always be outliers.....

    i am talking about in the thick of things you will find close matchup on both accounts 95% of times.......
    i can provide you evidence on how it behaves in the tiers 12-5.......
  • ContestOfNoobsContestOfNoobs Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★★
    edited June 2018
    karci79 wrote: »
    Sorry but i still dont get it. Maybe because of my week english...however i see that nobody knows the algorytm how because its kabam's secret...
    We are at tier 1 and we can get in war alli with 200% war rating and 400% alli rating.
    And why is different on higher tiers is not clear to me also.
    Can you imagine how it was riddiculous if they see our 5k deffenders againt trheir more than 10k?!
    So its obvious that im asking why its like this and why it can not be more balanced in every tier...

    lol u are not tier 1 and complain that ur getting outmatched, what if ur alliance in game?

    look at the video

    it is a TIER 4 war

    war rating
    OMNI war 1991 rating
    CHULAZO war 1910 rating


    Total allaince power as an allaince
    OMNI 14 million
    CHULAZO 8millon

    everything is based on war rating. not total allaince power
    @karci79
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    edited June 2018
    Sorry but in that case there is no ally with simmilar war, alli rating id rather get notice that there is nobody who we can play with than get ally whos 300% strong in both parameters. Because its waste of our time. So i suggesting to make some limits in percents, of course.
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    @ContestOfNoobs it clearly considers both factors with the priority being war rating ally rating is a secondry factor. would you like my hundreds of screenshots i have to prove this??? would you like to come and join either of my 4mil ally or my 8mil ally to see this in action???
    i think not......
    i dont think i can ever convince people up top that this is a thing because it wasnt before.
    it wasnt when ur ally was low and climbed up....
    things were different....
    but it doesnt affect you now cus you have already made your climb up....
    they changed it somewhere around start of/early season 1
    but....
    regardless of this.
    the biggest problem that causes arguments like this and many others is kabam being so tight lipped and secretive and refusing to tell players how things actually work.....
    this is something that many people ask and question for a long time.
    it would be about time for kabam to step up and address this and tewll us exactly wat happens and why allies up high see thing differently to allies in the middle....
    @Kabam Miike @Kabam Zibiit
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    And if everything is based on war rating, for me its wrong, because this is not accurate by my experiences.
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    And again can you tell how is this war rating counting? How can we get from 0 to 150?
  • ContestOfNoobsContestOfNoobs Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★★
    edited June 2018
    @Maat1985

    no the allaince war matchmaking has always been the same.

    you asked

    ""can you explain me how a 5mil ally in tier 4 only ever faces opponents between 5-7mil???? and i mean never above 7.5 mill opponent...... "
    ^ this is only 2 million diference?

    i just showed u a 8m allaince going against a 14m allaince in tier 4!
    watch the video its right there with time stamps lol


    both alliance had a similar war rating thats why they was matched up.
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    And its wrong to ask why is the war rating the main factor when everybody see that these 2 allies are in absolutely different leagues??? And its wrong to ask if there is possibillity how to make it more competetive, it means change the algorytm how the opponent is generating ;).
  • ContestOfNoobsContestOfNoobs Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★★
    edited June 2018
    karci79 wrote: »
    And its wrong to ask why is the war rating the main factor when everybody see that these 2 allies are in absolutely different leagues??? And its wrong to ask if there is possibillity how to make it more competetive, it means change the algorytm how the opponent is generating ;).

    thats how it is man.

    my allaince is 18m millin all together...and if we all decided to move and create a fresh alliance from start.

    it would have 0 war rating...
    and when we search for our first war... will match us opponents thats close to 0

    we would start at tier 22 with war rating 0 and would have to climb up from 0

    but our allaince as a whole will stay at 18m.
  • karci79karci79 Member Posts: 11
    edited June 2018
    And thats why i suggest to change it ;). I dont want to play against 18mil ally just because the same war rating. However im sure that our ally get last time ally with double war rating and honestly this is the reason why i've started to ask why it is possible...and if its possible to make it more by my opinion more fairplay ;)
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,412 ★★★★
    edited June 2018
    @ContestOfNoobs you showed me an example of an outlier to what i am saying......

    you did not tell me how waht i said can happen.....
    what i said i am not making it up. i have screenshots of my conversation with an ally leader in tier 4 who has a 4mil alliance who says all his matchups are 5-7 mill alilies.
    so whilst you posted an outlier you failed to say how this could happen.....

    as i said you guys in top tiers are blinded by being at the top you cannot and do not see what is going on below you.

    it has changed but it is not affecting the allies right at the top as the pool size is so small so to break into the very top you have no choice but to fight these strong allies as there are no weak opponents there.

    how it is working up the top is not how it is working down below.
  • Primmer79Primmer79 Member Posts: 2,968 ★★★★
    @Maat1985 I think what you are seeing is a trend or correlation, rather than a cause. I am not at the top, but I have seen matches at the top. I am not at the bottom but have friends and info from the bottom.

    From my experience and conversations, war rating is the sole factor for matching, but war rating TENDS to match with alliance rating. There are obviously exceptions to both depending on match time, etc.

    The one thing I can say from my experience, is there are a lot of nerds (including me) in this game, always looking for a leg up and always testing parts of the game. If alliance rating did truly play a part, it would be taken advantage of by now.
Sign In or Register to comment.