**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Trading champions in alliances
Whataduck
Posts: 130
Hey, as the title already states, I feel kabam should implement this function. It would be fun and interactive. I feel the community will embrace this and maybe lighten the mood in the game and our pockets.
Maybe I'm still drunk and I'm in a nice dream right now, but could you imagine the money and whales you could attract? For example let's say I have a 5 star Blade and someone in my alliance has a 5 star Stark Spidey, there could be an option that if we want to execute a equal trade, we would have to pay you (kabam) let's say it would cost 2,000 units. Then I'm happy and he or she is happy. But like I said I could be in bed dreaming about a hangover.
Maybe I'm still drunk and I'm in a nice dream right now, but could you imagine the money and whales you could attract? For example let's say I have a 5 star Blade and someone in my alliance has a 5 star Stark Spidey, there could be an option that if we want to execute a equal trade, we would have to pay you (kabam) let's say it would cost 2,000 units. Then I'm happy and he or she is happy. But like I said I could be in bed dreaming about a hangover.
1
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Also it would ruin the main concept of the game
And I said 12 mediocre champions for the best “champions”, emphasis on the plural. Meaning the 12 best champions in the game, genius. Please learn to read what I said. Thank you.
Your idea is still terrible.
All it will be is someone making a new account, pulling a few 5* and then either swapping all their good champs from their main profile to the second one to get all the act 5, LoL and act 4 rewards again. Or, if I pull a blade on a second account I can just send that to my main one in place of a she hulk. Trading champions in this game will never work, or be implemented.
Even Seatin’s tier list gets disagreed with which is widely accepted as a good sort of guideline to which champs are different levels. Every day people ask why X champion isn’t in Y tier. It’s because it’s subjective.
As you get further in the game people tend to agree more about which champs are good but at the start someone might just really love Hulkbuster and want him, but they aren’t allowed to swap their Captain marvel for him.
You can’t just decide that one champ is equal in value and that decision is full stop the only one. And if kabam did do that then people would be annoyed. Why is X23 in the same tier as Psylocke (for example), X23 is way better.
A good champion to someone doing act 3 is anyone who has alright damage. A good champion to someone at the end of the game is utility, damage, healing etc. There’s a huge difference and that is why your idea will never work.
If you can’t handle people questioning your idea what’s the point suggesting one? Seems to me you only want people to agree with you no matter what.
I wasn’t negative until you were sarcastic and rude to me. Before that I just pointed out what I would do if your idea was implemented.
Your idea is a negative concept. It imbalances the game. Everybody will just trade champs with each other depending on their needs. Let's look at LoL. Want to beat LoL with the fewest amount of units spent overall? Here have a r5 5* Blade. Want to do LoL in the shortest time available? Here have a r5 5* Stark Spidey or SL. Want to take on Abomination without spending a ton on units? Here have Medusa. Want to fight X-23? Here have Void.
And don't even talk about someone having a newly obtained 1/1 5* Blade but gets conned into trading it for a 1/1 5* Antman just because they saw the new Antman movie and loved him. They're of similar strength and value at rank 1, no? Well that an exaggeration, but you should get the drift that the game was never designed for trading of champions. This topic has been raised so many times before, and the same response holds every time....No!
Just thought of this, what about each new champion, do we need to vote every 2 weeks on how good they are. Or when a champ gets nerfed or buffed, do we need to vote then?
Y'all make stuff way more difficult than it has to be, he had a simple request.
My only opinion is if you trade it has to be the same rank... 5 for 5, 4 for 4 (no pun), 3 for 3, etc
No “they” are acting as though it’s an easily exploitable and badly thought out idea.