Please remove the crappy 5*s from the game.
Armaganon00
Member Posts: 741 ★★
There is no need for 5 * champs to be garbage.
We dont need Spidergwen, Luke Cage, Kamala Kahn ect.. 5 stars should be a rewards for hard work. Not a depressing kill your self moment because a month was wasted.
We dont need Spidergwen, Luke Cage, Kamala Kahn ect.. 5 stars should be a rewards for hard work. Not a depressing kill your self moment because a month was wasted.
12
Comments
There is really no NEED for any 4*s to be crappy, or any hero at all except that is what the game is. The chance of getting crappy heroes makes it more satisfying when you pull a good one. And it makes people more willing to spend for things like awakening stones and feature crystals to get the heroes that are hard to get because of the plethora of heroes in general.
I understand you want good heroes and are upset with a bad pull but that is kind of the business model and psychology of gambling and f2p games.
I think u missed the point. For most of the population of the game 5 stars take forever to get. My 1st took 6 months..5 stars are the cream of the crop, and for Kambam to add the entire roster of champs including champs that will never get ranked up. Whats the point? U wait forever to finally get a 5 star to help clear the money grab content of the game and you get spidergwen, collosus or luke cage. Least before they decided to add them all the only crappy champ was iron patriot. Least the others had purpose. Atleast if we get to have the worst add the bests to, Thor, Sw, DD... Or lower the amount of shards it takes to be disappointed. I am already at over 200 premium disappointment crystals with no 4 star. My last 10 4 stars were a mix of antman, spidergwen, kamala kahn. And my last 3 5stars was winter soldier. So yeah im tired of the ****. It be nice to add something like a meter or exp on crystal popping that lets u purchase a champ. So you dont have to wait 2 years to get someone good to clear content with.
He's a solid champ but I could see pulling him three times in a row being frustrating. I've pulled rhino a total of five times, which is more times then I've pulled any 4* in 2.4 years playing the game. I'm not a baller with 30 or more 5*s, I've only got 11 and only two of those duped. It's more then a little aggravating. It's strange how many people I know have multiple dupes of the same 5*.
Lower the price of 5*s to 5k. Everyone knows champs MUST be duped to be good. To flood the pool by 300% you have to lower the price. Avg player saves up for a basic 5* every 2-3 months, only to be let down by a new champ that's USELESS till duped. There's no point in ranking up any past R2 because you could waste t4cc.
It's insane that we have to explain something so simple.
So, at least lower the basic pool to 5k, for starts. Keep the featured at 15k for all I care
Or, give us more content/challenges to EARN 5* shards
Exactly. I have both cyclops. What's the point of two with same movements and essentially abilities.
You're saying a real problem, but it's fixed easy. If they low prices then they should cut the saved shards too. It would be similar to shares and splits. For example, if the price is lowered to 2000 shards (1/5) then that people will have now 15000 shards.
But I'm agree, the simple solution and the best is to have more ways to get more 5* shards.
Side Note: Gwen is not the first choice, I'll give you that. However, if I can beat an R5 Duped Magik with my R3 Duped SG, she ain't that bad. Lol.
But if you're happy with them, well I hope many of them for you.
I should be honest, I would be happy with a Spider Gwen 5* because i like use her sometimes, BUT just if the Collector GIF me her for FREE, because I'm sure I want a good champ after grind so many shards for 4 months.
But who makes that choice on who gets to be in a 5 star vs who does not?
That's the point. Most people are happy with their first 5* regardless of who it is. You're happy with any 5* if you're trying to build a Roster of them. The rest is preference. We can't edit the Crystal based on who uses what at the Top Tier. They're added because that's the order they appeared. People don't spend hours and months designing something to call it **** and scrap it.
There no need for the worst champions as a 5 star. Average perhapes, Great yes.. But the worst champs have not to offer to the game but arena. Perhaps if they do bases like in transformers. Or allow for multiple quests to be started at once, then people would use the garbage champs..
U have not answered my question who determines if a champ is too bad for a 5 star crystals
I do not know why no one has answered your question yet. So let me try.
The reason why the complaints are here against certain champs is because they, objectively speaking, have nothing to offer over another champ. Take Gwen. There is nothing about her that makes her special. Actually to top things off, she has a special 1 that is pretty much the worst special 1 in the game. Please tell us what necessity there is to have a Gwen over any other Science champ.
Or lets take Luke Cage. He has great physical resistance you say? Well, try taking him against some of the monsters in the game. It won't matter. He has indestructible ability? Well, how useful is that going to be in a very long fight? While we are on the topic of the length of a fight, Luke Cage has some of the worst base damage I have seen. Even his specials can be ridiculous at dealing damage.
Basically, you can easily figure out who doesn't deserve to even be in this game by looking at whether the champs actually offer something new and useful to the table. The problem with Kabam is that they keep offering new champs where most of them are simply not meeting that requirement.
The other solution, as some here have pointed out, is to actually buff these characters in a way that they become interesting. Instead, Kabam is trying to make a fighter where there are tons of champs but majority of them are redundant or useless. That is not a good design for a fighting game.