**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Please make AQ selection idiot proof
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
of course... and my officer mad this mistake once... he admitted he was in a hurry... i am confident it will not happen again......
but still....
why cant we ask for things that mmake life easier.....
like the guy asking the otherday to have the inventory sorted properly......
not really a problem.....
but something that could be done better......
efficeincy and reduced error rate come froms simplified streamlined designs and memory where possible.....
if something can be designed to default to the most common used or the last used setup then it should.....
as i said the mas default to last selected... why not the number of bgs????
why would anyone be against this change???? it has no potential to cause more error then the current system... only the potential to reduce error.....
why be against it?? unless you want to benifit when someone else fails
why not this????
AQ team = last used
AWD team = last used
AWA team = last used
Solo Quest team = last used
arena team = = last used (provided they have refreshed)
map selection for AQ = last used
why is the number of bgs different????
it only makes sense it would also be last used.....
everything else defaults to last used...
why not this......
by your logic map selection should default to map 1
and team selection should default to you 1* champs....
nether of these would be a problem for most as you would easily select you correct map / team.....
but it makes it easier that it remembers......
i already listed if you had read my previous post........
well yeah cus when i use them i could easily be typing more than i do... but i have cut my statement short to move on to the next. so they are grammatically correct.
you should hear how much more information i provide when i actually talk. I am a massive chatterbox
confirmation boxes are always helpful...... they do it for aq team and aw team selections
Choosing what Team you use is not the same as making decisions for an entire Ally.
exactly it is more important. so there is more reason for it to have the ability to remember your previous selection. cus it affects 29 others if you make an error....
i wish that possible for soooo many things in life.......
so many laws and regulations are designed purely to cater for idiots......
There already is. Its the last step before hitting confim
If it defaults then there will be complaints about forgetting to change back etc.. No one will happy regardless of what system it is.
The reoccuring problem is your officers who are overhasty, illiterate or whose cognitive functions are performing below standard. It is not the selection screen that's the probkem. There are 3 points where you can go back and correct an error in selection before pushing 'start'. How on earth can you claim it's the App's fault? The claim alone underlines said lack of patience, reading skills or intelligence.
To all those claiming all alliances start 3 bg anyway: Not every alliance is like yours. We, for example, have 16 solid players, with real life obligations, and now we can do map 3 and map 2 instead of either benching 6 players or losing prestige. This change is most welcome!
There is a difference: In aviation and medicine, an error means death. This game is not remotely of that importance. Moreover, the processes are so much more difficult that it is almost impossible for humans to oversee everything. Reading 3 very straightforward and unambiguous screens, with the option to correct a mistake, is primary school level difficult. So this comparison of yours is flawed.
If we stop making people responsible for their actions, the world will end. Now I agree with not relying on human vigilance in areas where the consequences are disastrous if an error occurs and/or the processes are of such complexity that it invites errors, but for something my 6yo son wouldn't have trouble with and which, if done wrong, does not seriously harm anyone, we should always place responsibility with the individual. Because no mistakes = no learning.
I was thinking about that too, what if the officer from his alliance sees this? He must be a joy to be in a alliance with
it is a very welcome change.....
which is why i suggest it defaults to the last amount of BGs u used. same as your map defaults to last maps run.....
Again, once is an error. Repeatedly is just not paying attention.