“Fixed alliance war matchmaking”

ZomagedonZomagedon Member Posts: 31 ★
in General Discussion
I’m noticing no difference at all with the matchmaking. It’s still as unfair as it was last season for our alliance. We are battling an alliance that’s well over double our alliance rating, It’s still only based on war rating.

«1345

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    Bronze against Gold, just incase someone tries to make the "punching above their weight" excuse.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    Just stop. Drop down from what? Bronze 3? Against a Gold 3? Just stop.
  • GreekhitGreekhit Member Posts: 2,820 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    Just stop. Drop down from what? Bronze 3? Against a Gold 3? Just stop.

    There are stone brackets below Bronze3. There are rewards there too crafted for low allies 😁
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 5,901 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    No, the whole argument was people were punching above their weight and they had to be knocked down to their "place". That doesn't apply here. You have an Alliance trying to come up, Bronze 1 last Season, Bronze 3 this, and they're facing side effects from changing it so drastically. Enough with the "War Rating is gospel".

    Well its kabams game. they make the rules. Rules say war rating is the gospel at the moment. Take it or leave it.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    Buttehrs said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.

    Except I'm pretty sure you've stated quite a few times your done with the back and forth. so which is it. Kabam said war rating rules. If you dont like it, tell them. Instead of spamming each and every matchmaking post that kabam is wrong.
    You mean as opposed to spamming it that everything is right because the War Ratings are the same and it will all balance out? Pretty sure the other side can have a voice too.
  • Fantasy_91Fantasy_91 Member Posts: 243 ★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.

    Bronze3 is a fairly big pool. If they were high enough up, then it's still possible they could remain in bronze3.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    Fantasy_91 said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.

    Bronze3 is a fairly big pool. If they were high enough up, then it's still possible they could remain in bronze3.
    It's the fact they're coming up against a Gold 3 that's almost 3 times their size.
  • Fantasy_91Fantasy_91 Member Posts: 243 ★
    Same with bronze1. Big pool
  • ZomagedonZomagedon Member Posts: 31 ★

    Panchulon21 said:

    Looks even to me. That war rating is a perfect match!

    There’s literally no way my alliance can with tho.
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 5,901 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    Buttehrs said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.

    Except I'm pretty sure you've stated quite a few times your done with the back and forth. so which is it. Kabam said war rating rules. If you dont like it, tell them. Instead of spamming each and every matchmaking post that kabam is wrong.
    You mean as opposed to spamming it that everything is right because the War Ratings are the same and it will all balance out? Pretty sure the other side can have a voice too.
    It is right. Kabam has made that rule. If you really want it changed, go to the suggestions forum.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,561 ★★★★★
    Buttehrs said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    Buttehrs said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    I will continue to point out these side effects because unlike some, I'm not willing to ignore the problems people are facing.

    Except I'm pretty sure you've stated quite a few times your done with the back and forth. so which is it. Kabam said war rating rules. If you dont like it, tell them. Instead of spamming each and every matchmaking post that kabam is wrong.
    You mean as opposed to spamming it that everything is right because the War Ratings are the same and it will all balance out? Pretty sure the other side can have a voice too.
    It is right. Kabam has made that rule. If you really want it changed, go to the suggestions forum.
    I'm capable of navigating the Forum all by myself, thanks.
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    No, the whole argument was people were punching above their weight and they had to be knocked down to their "place". That doesn't apply here. You have an Alliance trying to come up, Bronze 1 last Season, Bronze 3 this, and they're facing side effects from changing it so drastically. Enough with the "War Rating is gospel".

    This is a perfect counter example to your pi not war rating equals skill.Dispite having a good PI they were apparently not skilled enough to maintain that gold rating so dropped down.
  • ZomagedonZomagedon Member Posts: 31 ★
    Some people here aren’t understanding. We’ve been in bronze 1 for the past 10 seasons, and we haven’t been able to get any higher because of the matchmaking and it keeps putting us against way better alliances because we have similar war ratings. Just because we have the same war rating, that doesn’t mean we have any chance at beating an alliance that’s leagues above us. Just because things are more fair for the higher up alliances, it doesn’t justify how us players in bronze are being treated. I don’t understand why it can’t be based off of both alliance rating AND ALSO war rating. Or better yet, why not get rid of war rating all together, because it only really makes things worse for alliances that are trying their best to come up. I don’t see how this “new” system is “putting us in our place” when we’ve always been in bronze for 10 seasons anyways. We don’t even have a real chance to win this time. No one can convince me I’m in a fair war just because of war rating alone. It’s not like I can get back to bronze 1 with this kind of matchmaking, now my alliance is stuck in bronze 3, which is even worse. At first we were able to get into silver 2, then it got worse and worse overtime and now we are struggling to stay in bronze. It’s all BS.
  • ZomagedonZomagedon Member Posts: 31 ★
    Lormif said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    No, the whole argument was people were punching above their weight and they had to be knocked down to their "place". That doesn't apply here. You have an Alliance trying to come up, Bronze 1 last Season, Bronze 3 this, and they're facing side effects from changing it so drastically. Enough with the "War Rating is gospel".

    This is a perfect counter example to your pi not war rating equals skill.Dispite having a good PI they were apparently not skilled enough to maintain that gold rating so dropped down.
    We were never in gold to begin with
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    Zomagedon said:

    Lormif said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    No, the whole argument was people were punching above their weight and they had to be knocked down to their "place". That doesn't apply here. You have an Alliance trying to come up, Bronze 1 last Season, Bronze 3 this, and they're facing side effects from changing it so drastically. Enough with the "War Rating is gospel".

    This is a perfect counter example to your pi not war rating equals skill.Dispite having a good PI they were apparently not skilled enough to maintain that gold rating so dropped down.
    We were never in gold to begin with
    Where did I state you were?
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.