JRock808 wrote: » Diversity should be a multiplier for defense kills. More diverse defense gets a higher multiplier, thus more points for kills. It adds a little strategy back, at least. Do we go for a strong defense and get more, less valuable, kills, or a diverse one which will get fewer kills, but more points for each. That took me 30 seconds to come up with, so I'm sure it could be improved but damn does it sound better than the current system and it gets that diversity metric included?
I_am_Groot wrote: » I know my reply will be not popular. Well, maybe it will be not read neither, like I've not read the almost 70 pages here. Anyway here I go. After all, I think this change was made in the right way. Kabam wanted diversity and Everyone was begging for diversity. Now we have Diversity. AND Defenders Kills should be out. Yep, it should be removed. Why? if people could score points with Defenders Kills, then people will pass of Defenders Diversity and stay with their Kill-makers Defenders. It's pretty evident. And you can know it just reading people here, everyone is pissed out because they now should use different champs, rank up new champs and their champs already ranked up for the only purpose AWD are a waste. If they could choose between DDiversity points and DKills points they will stay with DK because they are already have the champs and they are points factories. About people complaining because some Wars are lose just because DD points, well it will happen no matter the system. In the former system we lost Wars despite we had more kills just because the other team had High Rated Defenders. I.e. maybe it was the exact same thing because they had maybe some "specials" high pi champs and we were screwed. Even, if they had just normal champs but ultra maxed then the fair we should won anyway because we were skillest beating stronger enemies and it was easier for them; but we lost and nobody cried because it was already the system. No matter the system, if you can find a guilty for the lose you will do it, but people is prone to do it just when a new "unfair" system is released.
JRock808 wrote: » Youd probably want a balance. Strong champs on good nodes, and diverse filler on the steamroll easy nodes. Perhaps the multiplier scales higher on the diverse end, giving those that go fully diverse the most potential, knowing that a skilled alliance may negate much of it through not dying. I know math isn't Kabams strong suit, lol, but you could devise a formula that couldn't be set in stone.. especially considering the other alliance has the opportunity to set your potential score as well.
JRock808 wrote: » Well I'm sure we could hash out a system that works and incorporates elements desired by both players and Kabam, but I get paid for that at work. I only offer what I can muster here in the slim hope the game becomes exciting again.
Morgan wrote: » Honestly, there's such an easy fix for Wars, diversity, and MYstic issues.1 battlegroup, 50 defenders, 6 classes available: a)50/6=8 Limit the defenders to 8 per class as mandatory. Once 8 of a kind has been deployed in a single battlegroup, you can no longer place any other champs of that class. b)Of the 2 spots remaning, make them act as "Jollies". Give em a special node pheraps (50% bane?), and apply a DIVERSITY bonus if there's 6 different jollies among the 3 groups not being a double of any other placed champ. c) mini-bosses and boss MUST be different classes. What you can fix with it?1) Mystic Wars. Yes, we'll still fight Magiks, Dormis, and Hoods, but 8 x Group aren't that bad. 2)DIversity. Diversity will still be achieved, just not being the only scoring point anymore. You'll be forced to diversity by having to balance out the number of champs x class to deploy. 3)Mystic bottleneck on minis-boss section: having to need 6 diff classes for these 6 diff nodes makes it perfect. 4)Jollies: there's lots of new things you can make out with them! 5)Defenders kills: as mystic wars would be solved, defenders kills can indeed count again.
JRock808 wrote: » The real ,problem is that Kabam will take the fastest, easiest, cheapest way out. Sorry to bring it up again, but look at MD and dexterity. It takes more than a few minutes to fix this obviously broken mechanic so they just rebuild war to try and lessen the impact? A bit like killing the patient to cure the disease. Expecting complicated scoring systems that really don't help their content creation isn't in the cards. Even returning defensive kills isn't going to solve the awful map design, time commitment and truly uninspired nodes.
Huluhula wrote: » Makes me sad that they deleted your post because you spoke your mind
R4GE wrote: » The biggest problem I am seeing with diversity at the moment (moving away from the scoring issue) is players are now being told who to rank up. Do it, or get out. Don't think this is something avoidable if you want to stay in a competitive alliance. This goes against what Kabam wanted for players in the past and why certain events were removed from the game.
RagamugginGunner wrote: » R4GE wrote: » The biggest problem I am seeing with diversity at the moment (moving away from the scoring issue) is players are now being told who to rank up. Do it, or get out. Don't think this is something avoidable if you want to stay in a competitive alliance. This goes against what Kabam wanted for players in the past and why certain events were removed from the game. That's going to really suck if/when they fix the system. I know you're against them but the demand for RDTs will be high.
zero7 wrote: » i have really enjoyed playing this game but it has lost the most interesting part in the aw changes. i’m close to hanging it up. i know the standard response to that is “leave then, nobody is forcing you to stay.” whoever wants to say that, you are correct.
R4GE wrote: » zero7 wrote: » i have really enjoyed playing this game but it has lost the most interesting part in the aw changes. i’m close to hanging it up. i know the standard response to that is “leave then, nobody is forcing you to stay.” whoever wants to say that, you are correct. I am getting close to that point as well. But its many other factors other than just this AW. In general its the creativity that I am not seeing. Anymore I am just here in hopes that Kabam will find away to make this game enjoyable again. AW 2.0 was just a hard kick in the ass.
R4GE wrote: » While the new system is continuing much frustration it seems the lack of feedback given to players is causing more damage and frustration. Cant help but feel Kabam is failing us right now. Currently 81 pages of debates and feedback and much of it being a majority of players wanting the same thing. Why are we still in the dark? How long does it really take for a full development team to sit around and decide what changes are needed when many answers are sitting on this thread? By now I feel we should have gotten an announcement to inform us of what changes are coming so we know what to expect. For them saying their goal is to give us enough heads up on upcoming changes or new content they seem to truly be letting us down right now. We have no clue what we should be doing as we wait while others are assuming this is how it is and currently attempting to make changes or being forced to by others. I can easily see many players get the shaft when this is all said and done.
Heywood wrote: » Awesome. 1.5 mil higher rated alliance. We play better and will lose because they ranked up bad champs. Fix the damn game.
hurricant wrote: » FAL7EN wrote: » Heywood wrote: » Awesome. 1.5 mil higher rated alliance. We play better and will lose because they ranked up bad champs. Fix the damn game. Adapt lol If we place our highest ranked unique defenders, and face an alliance with 1 million rating above us, how can we adapt? wtf are you even talking about
FAL7EN wrote: » Heywood wrote: » Awesome. 1.5 mil higher rated alliance. We play better and will lose because they ranked up bad champs. Fix the damn game. Adapt lol
FAL7EN wrote: » hurricant wrote: » FAL7EN wrote: » Heywood wrote: » Awesome. 1.5 mil higher rated alliance. We play better and will lose because they ranked up bad champs. Fix the damn game. Adapt lol If we place our highest ranked unique defenders, and face an alliance with 1 million rating above us, how can we adapt? wtf are you even talking about Calm down big man lol I see someone needs a break from the game. Guess you don't remember when Adora told the community to "Adapt" when they made a change to the game.