Who is more worthy of a Generic Awakening Gem?
Who is more worthy of a Generic Awakening Gem? 72 votes
22 votes
50 votes
Comments
-
CAIWIdeal archangel sig is 1121
-
ArchangelFor me personally there have been more situations where i used the Ability accuracy reduction from Archangel's sig than where i used Cap's sig. (Have both sig 200 it's just personal experience)0
-
ArchangelAnyone saying ideal archangel sig is 112, it's ****. I've a sig 20 and he do wonders for me. Just go with it, no regrets, it's been months for me. I've CAIW sig 200 as well. Not bad but I'd go with archangel4
-
ArchangelBeardo's sig needs to be high for it to be reliable, AA just needs sig 1. Helps to have it over the 3-neuro threshold, but he doesn't need it.
Going further on Beardo and other high-sig champions, I'd suggest holding off on awakening them until you have enough stones to get their sig fairly close to max. It's not uncommon to naturally dupe a champ before you get their sig to a useful level, or even right after you awaken them.1 -
ArchangelMine is at sig 30 and I am very happy with it0
-
ArchangelConsidering you don't have much stones. AA over CAIW. Don't get me wrong but CAIW is amazing, but sig 40 ain't enough.0
-
I have capiw and generic gem, i should use it for him or wait for other champs?
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
capiw and sig200 is nice but you need sig200 for only one thing, the debuff shrugging.
I agree AA is the ideal choice, needs only sig1, but anyone saying capiw not worthy unless sig200 is not thinking it right.2 -
CAIWAt sig200 he’s my guy0
-
You are absolutely right. Sig 200 cap IW starts with sig 1. For some people it will be a while before they can amass 200 stones. Awaken him and get the benefits of his utility right now and then keep building on his sig.pseudosane said:capiw and sig200 is nice but you need sig200 for only one thing, the debuff shrugging.
I agree AA is the ideal choice, needs only sig1, but anyone saying capiw not worthy unless sig200 is not thinking it right.1 -
Archangel
Agreed sig 40 is only 48.7% chance to apply debuffs and purify debufs. It's not the absolute worst but it is no where near the best.pseudosane said:capiw and sig200 is nice but you need sig200 for only one thing, the debuff shrugging.
I agree AA is the ideal choice, needs only sig1, but anyone saying capiw not worthy unless sig200 is not thinking it right.0 -
CAIW
You didn't tell us you have Karnak! Obvious choice right thereHalala said:I have capiw and generic gem, i should use it for him or wait for other champs?
0 -
I can take cap to sig150-160, is it worth if i use generic gem for himFlyGalaxyBomb said:
Agreed sig 40 is only 48.7% chance to apply debuffs and purify debufs. It's not the absolute worst but it is no where near the best.pseudosane said:capiw and sig200 is nice but you need sig200 for only one thing, the debuff shrugging.
I agree AA is the ideal choice, needs only sig1, but anyone saying capiw not worthy unless sig200 is not thinking it right.
0 -
Yes. Capiw is a very useful tool in everyone's kit.Halala said:
I can take cap to sig150-160, is it worth if i use generic gem for himFlyGalaxyBomb said:
Agreed sig 40 is only 48.7% chance to apply debuffs and purify debufs. It's not the absolute worst but it is no where near the best.pseudosane said:capiw and sig200 is nice but you need sig200 for only one thing, the debuff shrugging.
I agree AA is the ideal choice, needs only sig1, but anyone saying capiw not worthy unless sig200 is not thinking it right.0 -
ArchangelAA barely needs any sigs. He would be my choice for a gem.
CAIW ideally should have 200.
Oh, and on the whole sig 112 nonsense... This vid is worth a watch if you still believe he needs sig 112...
https://youtu.be/aKPXOt9QUlI 1 -
ArchangelAA at sig 1 is perfectly fine
2
