Isn't it time......

Comments

• TheBair123 Member Posts: 5,344 ★★★★★

  October 2021

  well
  1) taking away 3*s from all cavs will result in chaos and terrible spending rates assuming that prices don't change
  2) the odds were actually increased a while back and are now a lot better than before
  3) if i ever open cav crystals, i'm hoping for a 4* dupe. one because i know i'm not going to get a 5* or 6*, and two because i need iso. if they make iso more available, then cav crystals that have 3*s will be bought less

  8
• BeastDad Member Posts: 1,780 ★★★★★

  October 2021

  It’s past time.

  0
• Peter116 Member Posts: 8 ★

  October 2021

  That Kabam finally revamp the alliance crystals (unstoppable colossus ones) + buff UC himself.

  1
• Lpoo Member Posts: 2,215 ★★★★★

  October 2021

  I’d like 3* dupes to give 50% the iso of a 4* instead of 8%. I think that’s a generally good compromise to your argument.

  11
• Mauled Member, Guardian Guardian › Posts: 3,957 Guardian

  October 2021

  As above ^ As lovely as it'd be to not see 3* in the crystals the gulf between spenders and non-spenders would be truly ludicrous, even the likes of BG - the top 0.001% of F2P - wouldn't be able to keep in top alliances. As a small spender - July/Black Friday - I can keep up fairly well at the moment, though I acknowledge that I've been pretty lucky with my pulls.
  
  If a Cav crystal guaranteed a minimum of 550 5* shards (because let's be real, most people have most 4* max sig, especially if they're dropping money/units on Cavs), then every time you buy one of those early access bundles you're getting ½ a 5* as a minimum the champion acquisition will go through the roof.

  1