Options
High ground should not be nerfed/rebalanced/removed/changed
Distal_less
Posts: 17 ★
For the last season, alliances in T3-T5 have had the choice of using any of the 3 defence tactics (high ground, untouchables and the regen one). Of all 36 season opportunities (1 per bg per war) we faced just 2 untouchables and the rest high ground, so it was fairly obviously the “meta” defence tactic.
Alliances in T1-T2 were forced into using untouchables the entire season and, just from looking at various war videos, had very little issues dealing with it. Now they’re being similarly forced into high ground for the next 2 seasons and they’re complaining about the tactic? Would be a slap in the face for the T3-5 alliances, who have complained about the BS-ness of high ground the entire season, just for a couple of higher tier YouTubers to complain about it and get it changed.
Alliances in T1-T2 were forced into using untouchables the entire season and, just from looking at various war videos, had very little issues dealing with it. Now they’re being similarly forced into high ground for the next 2 seasons and they’re complaining about the tactic? Would be a slap in the face for the T3-5 alliances, who have complained about the BS-ness of high ground the entire season, just for a couple of higher tier YouTubers to complain about it and get it changed.
9
Comments
You realise if kabam’s envisioned cycle of these aw tactics lasts for 6 seasons? That means 72 mostly high ground wars for t3-5 but only 2 seasons worth if forced high ground for t1-2?